What is true about Evolution?

Question

This goes primarily to anti-Evolutionists:

EVOLUTION:

A) …states that we are all just one big accident; is a random process.
B) … is just a theory; it hasn’t been proven.
C) … states that we came from monkeys/apes – that they are our ancestors.
D) … A and B.
E) … A and C.
F) … B and C.
G) … all of the above.
H) … none of the above.

BTW: I know what Evolution is (i.e., I know the answer).

Answer 1

None of the above. The mutations are random, but selection is not. The theory HAS been proven (write me for details). It does not say that H. sapiens came from apes, but rather that apes and humans came from a common ancestor. For details, see reference.

Answer 2

There are a pair of theories at the back of this, yet something like endless regression rather says "it is so a ways returned we don't be responsive to and could no longer be responsive to." ideally, we don't be responsive to what began evolution. yet this could be tested greater heavily between micro and macro evolution. Macro evolution continues to be very pretty contested, and countless question its validity in the sphere of biology. Micro evolution is all approximately adaptaion to stay to inform the tale. Necessity is the mummy of invention...even though it could look that plenty it is reported in micro evolution is organic danger, no longer necessity. the two way, survival could be a stable motivator for adapability. that is quite of twisted good judgment, materials are constrained so a approach or the different a mutation happens which components one creature a miles better part over others (micro evolution)...at last those mutations will grow to be so great that there is an entire new species (macro evolution). yet there looks to need a making use of rigidity, because count number unearths its lowest stable point of power, why could it attempt to compete? what's thecontinual? of direction technological know-how Fiction does factor out that radiation can mutate lizards into horribly great fireplace respiratory beasts.

Answer 3

A- Not true. There is a method and rules that drive it.
B- Technically true for a scientific definition of theory, but it is more solid than the theory of gravity and most people would call that a proven fact. In fact we actually know a lot more about how it works.
C- Not even close to true. They are basically cousins.

Answer 4

definition:
theory: when several hypothesis and experiments come to the same conclusion

so in other it's more proven then creationism

mattheism says that evolution is not a mistake but the modification of life till we got us the final beings above the rest

and yes, proof is very important to a guy who believes a carpenter who claims he's the son of god's son and a imaginary friend that no one saw above the clouds when we all know beyond those clouds is Space!

OH! you're a gushing fountain of proof

Answer 5

What is true about evolution?
Lets see...
H) none of the above

I mean, the theory of evolution is what you just stated. But I don't believe in it. It's absurd.

Answer 6

I evolved from a baby

second of all, evolution doesn't say we came from monkeys, it says that they are our cousins and we shar a common ancestor.

Answer 7

You forgot the most obvious:

I) Hasn't been studied by person asking question.

Answer 8

G~ that is what people think but it is not true at all.

Answer 9

g

Answer 10

silly