Isn't that an oxymoron?
2006-12-13 11:11:08 · 26 answers · asked by Freedspirit 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
You're right. Here is another oxymoron: They don't want to let pregnant and poor teens get an abortion so they make her have the unwanted baby. When that baby grows up and becomes the inevitable criminal that a neglected and unwanted child becomes, they fight to the death to cut any social programs that may help guide him/her from a life of violent crime and when he/she finally is where everyone knew he/she would be then they're the first in line to support killing that same grown baby the fought like mad to keep. Now they want to put him to death, now they're pro death.
Makes no sense. I say If you're pro life be pro life all the way, not when it suits your political agenda.
Great question.
2006-12-13 11:20:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because the little sheep follow what their pastors tell them to do without thought or question. Since the Right is in power, and the conserative christians are getting concesions from the Republican party, they have to uphold their end of the bargain and have their mindless sheep bleatingly support the war. Pro-Life, Gay marriage, other "moral" issues are the smoke and mirrors they use to keep the sheep from possibly opening their eyes and thinking for themselves.
Baaa Baaa Baaa
Thank goodness for the Quakers and Menonites, or we might not have any real Christians in the country.
2006-12-13 11:22:01 · answer #2 · answered by Hatir Ba Loon 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
this may well be a stable question and one I get exhilaration from answering. i'm professional-existence The dying penalty is meant to punish an evil guy or woman as antagonistic to an harmless guy or woman alongside with a fetus. besides the undeniable fact that the undertaking is that harmless human beings do die interior the dying penalty. weapons while used good preserve human beings, it quite is an elementary reality that places with looser gun rules have decrease crime quotes. So actual possessing a gun will cut back the probabilities of somebody getting killed. As for conflict, I even have been puzzled approximately this one those days myself. i will comprehend the way conflict is at times necessary yet not civilian casualties and not preemptive conflict. so because it is my handle it.
2016-10-14 21:40:36 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Pro-Life is about innocent lives being lost for selfish reasons.
I know that Innocent's die in was and it is harsh, but great good can come out of war. WWII is a great example, but I know it is tired and old. So, are we still doing good over there? Have we or will we have made the place better? I sure hope so. I know that in Korea and Viet Nam it cannot easily be said, but you need to look at it in pieces not as a whole.
Right is never easy and should not be flippantly put off. Good question. Hopefully, we will bring about another era of peace.
2006-12-13 11:18:23 · answer #4 · answered by crimthann69 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Same as a Liberal Socialist claims to be for Pro-Choice , and yet doesn`t support the war ??
2006-12-13 11:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
It makes perfect sense. Pro lifers wish to preserve life to the best of our ability. That means protect the innocent and the helpless. If that means killing the killers, so be it. On balance, Life still wins. And quality of life improves when evil is removed from the planet.
Or do you think terrorists are good?
2006-12-13 11:22:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Let's think about this.
Is there a difference between a helpless infant, and a terrorist with a bomb strapped to him at the shopping mall where your daughter and her friends are hanging out?
If you can answer that, then I think you might be close to figuring it out.
Good luck!!
2006-12-13 11:49:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Abortion (murdering ones own child) is an abomination in my eyes. Children are innocent helpless souls. In war, Men fight so that others may live in freedom and not tryanny (unless you are a coward). Many have fought so that you have that right and are doing so right now in Iraq and Afghanistan. For every foot of freedom they gain is a victory for us all. Those they fight against are guilty of evil in my eyes.Gen. Franks said it best to his troops in Iraq. "Men, when you get home and you meet an anti-war protestor, shake his hand and wink at his girlfriend. Cause she knows she's dating a sissy".
2006-12-13 11:29:12 · answer #8 · answered by God 2 · 0⤊ 3⤋
were pro protecting the life of innocent children who have not had the time to prove their value or lack there of to society, and support the removal of oppressive regimes and against the strengthening of terrorist groups in terms of land held and recruitable population
2006-12-13 11:34:35 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
No that's just plain and simply putting your own ego issues to higher position than the instructions you were given by the peacemaker.
2006-12-13 11:16:21 · answer #10 · answered by royce r 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋