English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

then why is it so easy to believe that Jesus died on A CROSS? Which was a symbol of an ancient god in Jerusalem named Tammuz.
Reference:
http://www.thewordsofeternallife.com/cross.html

2006-12-13 10:09:32 · 2 answers · asked by JAMES R 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

I am talking in particular to churches who sponsor things such as Christmas and Halloween and other traditionals that in no way upholds God's laws and Jesus teachings.

To the dude who said that the Bible was written by a Roman...huh?
Moses wasn't a Roman none of the the original co-authors of the Bible who were inspired by God to write these scriptures were of Roman descent. Jesus taught these scriptures and Read from them himself.

2006-12-13 11:13:59 · update #1

2 answers

Isayah 59:15—
Yes, truth; the Law, is suppressed; and he who departs from evil; upholds the Law, is accounted as mad; makes himself a prey! Yahweh saw this, and it displeased Him that there was no justice in the last days.

People give in to deception in order to conform and be accepted by the majority. Today, the accepted man or woman is the one who goes to church, at least occasionally, and claims to accept the church doctrine, asking no questions. They can only say they are "born again Christians" if they do not study or practice the Laws written in the Bible. This is a great psychological move on Satan's part, because people who will not read the Scriptures will not learn the way to Yahweh and salvation, as the Savior showed so clearly.

Mattithyah 4:4—
But He answered, and said; It is written: Man does not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds out of the mouth of Yahweh.

Mattithyah 19:16-17—
16 And behold, one came to Him, and said; Teacher, what righteous thing may I do, so that I may have eternal life?
17 But He said to him: Why do you question Me about righteousness? There is only One Who is the standard of perfection, and that is Yahweh; so if you would enter into life, keep the Laws of Yahweh.

You just read the words of the Savior, showing the way to salvation. These words, the religions of today's world would rather you not read because you may start asking questions like, "Why aren't we keeping Yahweh's Laws today?" "Who is Yahweh?" "Why was Yahweh's Name removed from the Bible?" "Why aren't our prayers answered today?" "Why aren't we calling on and with the Name Yahweh as the inspired Scriptures tell us to do?"

If the people start asking questions and reading the holy writings, they will find that in the Bible, that preachers hold up in front of the people, are inspired writings condemning what the religions teach and practice.


DO NOT LEARN THE WAY
OF THE HEATHEN...
FOR THE RELIGIOUS CUSTOMS OF THE PEOPLES
ARE VAIN; WORTHLESS. - Yeremyah 10:2-3

2006-12-13 10:16:03 · answer #1 · answered by YUHATEME 5 · 0 2

You really do need some history on this take no offense good question the bible was wrote by a PAGAN but became a christain on his death dead! So there was something there right! I mean it is in archives that jesus was slane on the cross by the romans. The man who first wrote the first copy of the bible was a Roman!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Diocletian (284-305) came to the throne after a century of disorganization, internal dissent, economic collapse, and foreign invasions. A tough and practical soldier he had one ambition: to retire from the imperiate alive. And he managed to do it (an exceptional feat). To stem the descent into chaos, he decided that the Empire was too large to be adminstered by a central authority, so he divided it in half. The western half would be ruled by a colleague, Maximian, and the seat of government would be Rome; the eastern half would be ruled by Diocletian, and the seat of government was in Nicomedia. Maximian recognized Diocletian as "Augustus," or the senior ruler of the Roman emperor. Beneath these two were appointed to each two officials, called caesars, not only to help manage the administration, but to assume their respective empires on the death of the emperor. In this way, the succession was always guaranteed and the successors had already spent much of their career adminstering the empire. This would prevent both the possibility of the ambitious seizing of the imperiate by provincial generals and would prevent incompetents from assuming control of the Empire.

This was a brilliant strategy and, with other innovations, stabilized the Empire. Diocletian was the first emperor to manifestly break with Roman tradition. He shifted the seat of power to the east, in Nicomedia in Turkey. He also adopted eastern ideas of monarchy; he no longer called himself princeps or even imperator , but dominus , or "Lord." He took a crown and wore royal clothing; he demanded and got out and out worship by his subjects.

In 305, Diocletian retired to a farm to raise cabbages; he forced Maxmian also to retire. So the imperiate passed without fuss to their two caesars. This brilliant system, so promising in its inception, fell apart immediately as the two emperors began feuding. Within a year, the son of one of the original caesars gained the throne: Constantine (306-337). Like Diocletian, he ruled only half of the Roman Empire, the western half. But in 324, he abandoned the system and ruled over a single, united empire. However, he shifted the seat of government east to his own city in Turkey, Constantinople.

Constantine was like Diocletian in his affection for eastern ways of life and eastern views of monarchy. He took on himself all the trappings of an eastern king, as Diocletian had done, and declared the imperiate to be hereditary. After eight hundred years without a monarch, Rome had finally returned back to monarchy. Constantine, however, is one of the most noted rulers in Rome for he was the first emperor to convert to Christianity. Although he didn't make Christianity a state religion, his conversion provoked a wild proliferation of the faith, particularly in the eastern empire. Constantine, however, never really became a Christian ruler. He retained all the trappings of power including the demand that he be venerated as a god, as Diocletian had done.


Early Christianity
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Early Christianity
Constantine, however, had several problems with his new faith. The first was that there was no established doctrine. In fact, there were as many forms of Christianity as there were communities of Christians. The second was more pressing, for foundational Christianity was manifestly anti-political. Its founder, Jesus of Nazareth, consistently condemned worldly authority and insisted that the Christian life is a non-worldly, individualistic, non-political life. As a result, the foundational Christian texts are not only anti-Roman (for Judaea was part of the Roman Empire during the life of Jesus of Nazareth), but consistently dismissive of human, worldly authority. If Christianity were going to work as a religion in a state ruled by a monarch that demanded worship and absolute authority, it would have to be changed. To this end, Constantine convened a group of Christian bishops at Nicea in 325; there, the basic orthodoxy of Christianity was instantiated in what came to be called the Nicene creed, the basic statement of belief for orthodox Christianity. Constantine accomplished more, however, for the Nicene council also ratified his own power and Christianity would begin the long struggle, lasting to this day, between the anti-political ideas of Jesus of Nazareth and the Christianity that is compromised to allow for human authority and power. (A more thorough discussion of the Nicene Council and the history of Christianity in the late Empire can be found in the module, "Early Christianity")


European Middle Ages
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Byzantines
When Constantine died, he divided the Empire between his three sons who, as you might expect, began fighting one another over complete control of the Empire. His sons all adopted Christianity as well, but the emperor, Julian the Apostate (361-363), opposed the religion and tried to undo it by dismissing all the Christians from the government. He was a little too late and reigned a little too briefly, though, to have any real effect. The government of Rome during the fourth century essentially traces out a history of dynastic squabbles and constant internal fractiousness; it wasn't until the end of the century, in the rule of Theodosius (379-395), that Rome was again united under a single emperor. Theodosius made his mark in history by declaring Christianity the state religion of Rome; he made all pagan religions illegal. The Christian Roman state had entered the stage; however, history was about to dramatically change the character of Rome. In 410, the Visigoths, a Germanic tribe that had migrated into northern Italy under the pressure of migrations of the Huns, captured and sacked Rome. From 451 to 453, Rome was overrun by the Hunnish leader, Attila, and finally, in 455, the Vandals, another Germanic tribe, conquered Rome. Finally, in 476, Odoacer deposed the Roman emperor and made himself emperor. Power had passed from the Romans to the barbarians war-chiefs; the Middle Ages had begun. Rome now passed to two heirs: Europe in the west and, to the east, the Byzantines, who carried on the government structure, the social structure, the art and the thought of classical Rome and Greece.

s! The man who first wrote the bible was a Roman!

2006-12-13 10:31:14 · answer #2 · answered by out dated prod! 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers