English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-12-12 20:23:53 · 12 answers · asked by Red5 5 in Sports Martial Arts

12 answers

There's no apparent advantage to answering this

2006-12-12 21:10:24 · answer #1 · answered by coxon the box 7 · 0 0

No, because then I wouldn't be ambidextrous. I would only be right handed.

2006-12-12 21:54:59 · answer #2 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 0 1

If u gave it up, there would be no point in being ambidextrous, would there?

2006-12-12 20:29:31 · answer #3 · answered by jdog 3 · 0 1

No because I need it to fight off the crab people when all the world (except me) becomes metrosexual.

The prophecy of "when all the world is metrosexual, the crab people will reign supreme" is coming true as more and more men become pansy metrosexuals.

2006-12-13 05:18:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

nope i already am ambidextrous

2006-12-13 08:23:42 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

LoL!!!
Anyone can play poker but it takes a leper to throw in a hand.

2006-12-12 20:28:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

This is not a Martial Arts question. In fact it is not even a real question.

2006-12-13 03:18:49 · answer #7 · answered by yupchagee 7 · 0 0

no im also ambidextrous.but if you only had one arm what would you do when you got to 99 change hands.hahahahahalol.

2006-12-14 20:39:10 · answer #8 · answered by BUSHIDO 7 · 0 0

no ,because if you train correctly you will find that both sides become almost equally efficient,therefore it ceases to be a problem

2006-12-13 03:47:02 · answer #9 · answered by TERRY H 4 · 0 0

sure, then i'd be able to use all my arms.

2006-12-16 02:43:42 · answer #10 · answered by eprefugee 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers