I can't think of any.
2006-12-12 15:39:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by Drowningbluestars 4
·
1⤊
5⤋
I do not think that any theory or any suggested hypothesis can disprove god's existence, you cannot prove or disprove a non-physical phenomenon. At least it would not be a valid scientific proof. But if you do not care about being scientific as far as the proofs go then think about this: Humans are never going to be smart enough or intelligent enough (well individuals may be smart but I'm talkin humanity as a whole) to understand very basic scientific facts. In other words there will always be quarrels, wars, disagreements about which religion is better or more divine and etc as long as they keep believing in without questioning. I would like to think that all of those beliefs are created by man, to manipulate large groups of people into acting a certain way and ultimately so that the leader of that large sum can dominate and enforce power over a large geographic area; thus fullfilling one of the most natural instincts we humans possess: satisfying the personal ego...Well; that even exists in animals so the truth is not so far fetched from small things that we encounter in everyday life like our wants, wishes desires, and what we choose to believe or not believe.
2006-12-12 23:49:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The existence of a god (or gods) cannot be disproved (either can the existence of Snow White for that matter), however I could post much about the flaws of Christianity but I don’t want to slow down the Y server with a terabyte of information (I could get banned for that).
2006-12-12 23:47:26
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well... There is alot!
Check this website out... It made me think that believing in God is less reasonable.
http://grove.ufl.edu/~hasa/transcript.html
Here is an extract that I think you should think about:
God is inclined as a personal being who knows everything.. I think most Christians would believe that. Personal beings are capable of making decisions. Some of us would call that free will. If you can’t make a decision, you’ll never be able to make a choice for God or against. Free will requires that you have more than one option each of which is avoidable. A free decision can only be affected if you’re in a state of uncertainty during a period of potential. This means that in order to have free will, you can’t know the future. You can’t know what the future’s going to be or you don’t have free will, right? If you know it, if you predict it, you’re stuck, if you don’t have the potential to change it, to avoid it. But the **** being knows everything. He does know the future. If there’s a God and he’s omniscient, he knows all of his future choices. He knows what he’s going to do tomorrow. He has to, because he’s God, right? Therefore, in the mind of God, the future is fixed. It cannot be changed, not even by God. That does seem to put some serious limits on his power, doesn’t it? Tomorrow at twelve noon… Talk about materialism! This being who knows the future is utterly materialistic and complete robot and complete slave to whatever nature he has. If God shows off his power by changing what he was going to do anyway, then he wasn’t omniscient in the first place, was he? No being is both omniscient and omnipotent. That is logically impossible by definition. Such a being would not have more than one option. Such a being would not have an option that is avoidable. Such a being therefore, could not have free will and is therefore, not a personal being. It can’t make decisions. How could you relate to some being who is just robotic, computerized, and doesn’t really make any decisions, doesn’t make any judgements, can’t change his mind, can’t really make any evaluations, can’t have any free will? A personal being who knows that everything cannot exist, therefore cannot exist for God does not exist.
2006-12-12 23:37:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Max D 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
would it be right for me to post a question to all Christians asking for questions that will disprove atheism and the flaws of that theory? how about we all have our free choice to believe what we believe and use this forum to intelligently and respectfully share our beliefs? Since when does arguing get any of us more enlightened? I have said the same, and will continue to say the same thing to my fellow Christians who come on here and just spew idiocy in the name of Jesus.
2006-12-12 23:41:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Terri 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
You can't disprove God because He exists. Christianity has no flaws and no contradictions when rightly divided.
2006-12-12 23:41:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by Eaglet 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
there are many flaws in christianity, because it is practiced by humans, who are flawed by nature, design, evolution, whatever.
as for what can disprove it? there is nothing, outside of God, that can disprove something that we have found no physical evidence of.
as a christian and a scientist, i endeavor to prove the basis of the religion, that Jesus existsted (He did) and that God's divinity is proof of His existence.
-eagle
2006-12-12 23:40:33
·
answer #7
·
answered by eaglemyrick 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
You can't disprove the christian god any more than the muslim god, the flying spaghetti monster or the invisible pink unicorn - but christianity is far from flawless:
http://www.whydoesgodhateamputees.com/
http://www.godisimaginary.com/
http://www.skepticsannotatedbible.com/
2006-12-12 23:43:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by eldad9 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
You can't disprove a negative.As for flaws in christianity,just read the bible.It's full of them
2006-12-12 23:38:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by rosbif 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
How do you suppose you can disprove God's existence with questions?!
God's existence can be doubted, but never can His existence be disproved.
2006-12-12 23:40:04
·
answer #10
·
answered by Judah's voice 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
Try hard enough and you can shoot holes in anything, but always remember the first rule of logic. It is impossible to ever prove a negative. You can only prove a positive and then rationally assume that the opposite of that positive is false.
2006-12-12 23:39:31
·
answer #11
·
answered by Lion_Heart 3
·
1⤊
2⤋