2006-12-12 15:12:55 · 19 answers · asked by Jonathan N 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Since the slaughter of US Marines and Embassy personnel in Lebanon years ago, it is unlikely that US Forces willl return.
It is not in the interests of the USA to take the place of Israeli soldiers, who are quite capable to defend their nation's interests by themselves. Intelligence is already shared for the purpose of fighting terrorism.
2006-12-12 15:42:20 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 7⤊ 0⤋
Singaporean are nicely-conventional for their patrioticism. tat replaced into the end result from a survey some years back. yet whilst they're asked no count if or no longer they might die for their u . s . a ., maximum solutions are unfavourable. Who knows? There are not any actual super war. some human beings communicate greater effective than action. I stay in Singapore , and have look a super type of egocentric acts too, like the different answerer stated. besides, u think of the greater youthful adult men are taking component to their NS days? they simply have not got a call. some even stated tat 2 & a million/2 yrs is a 'waste' of their time, in words of their careers. They comprehend they're 'small' and would desire to be bullied by using the 'super' one sometime, so defence will become an significant element ought to 'do'. So, sorry youthful adult men, u ought to pass to NS, except u provide up S'pore citizenship..!!!
2016-10-05 06:09:23 · answer #2 · answered by bugenhagen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope, the US should stay out of Lebanon, but provide moral support to Israel & pro-democracy factions of Lebanon. These countries need to get the UN, Iran, & Syria out of the conflict. They are causing many of the unresolved issues because the UN has encouraged Israel to lay down their arms, but not disarm Hezbollah & other militias who are being supplied by Syria & possible Iran. Syria & maybe Iran are encouraging political assassinations of pro democracy supporters in Lebanon, so they can keep their power over that country.
2006-12-12 15:26:01 · answer #3 · answered by Eskimo Mom 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
So my husband, who is in the U.S. Army, should die so that no more Israeli soldiers die? What is the point of this question because it seems to placing the lives of Israeli's more important than our American military's. I think our military is busy and stretched out far enough as it is.
2006-12-12 15:16:18 · answer #4 · answered by 2007 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What, and give the Dems more of a reason to bash Bush?
Israel will fight no matter who gets in the way. They are a proud nation that wants to show the world not to mess with them.
2006-12-12 16:07:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, that would be an extremely bad idea, and would just serve to inflame things even more in that region. Just remember, for the people in that region, Israel is the little satan, and the US is the great satan, so I can't possibly imagine a worse situation.
2006-12-12 18:18:00 · answer #6 · answered by Crowfeather 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Let's let the people in Israel fight their own wars. Our men/women should not die for another country.
2006-12-12 15:34:42 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The USA army only likes soft targets
2006-12-12 17:59:42 · answer #8 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The US Armed Forces should be placed in every country and fight every conflict. That is what Freedom is.
Freedom's just another word for nothing left to lose.
Me and Bobby Magee: Kris Cristophersom
2006-12-12 15:23:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No,the United States needs to bring home our solders world wide,and let the other countries fight there own wars.Then we can put our solders on the borders of the United States,and let them protect who they suppose to.Which is the United States Of America. And let the rest of the world kill each other. That's what they want to do,so I say let them.
2006-12-12 15:26:46 · answer #10 · answered by George K 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋