Jesus had a lot of followers. The Romans saw the potential for insurrection. I'm not sure that they especially cared about the religious aspect of Jesus' teachings as much as the political implications (although the Jewish elite challenged His teachings as a rabbi), but were very concerned about his followers mistaking His role as that of an earthly king who had come to liberate the Jews from their Roman oppressors. Pontius Pilate wasn't getting paid to allow people to lend their support to a messianic figure, which could, theoretically, lead to open revolt.
2006-12-12 09:48:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
2⤋
The Romans only percieved Jesus as a threat at his birth, because they were afraid that the Jewish people, who were rebelling against the Romans at the time, would find strength in knowing that their King had come to set them free. Also, the Jewish believed that the Massiah would be a grand king that would fight for them. They chose Jesus to pick on, because his birth was fullfilling profecies of how the Massiah would be born into the world. However, near the end of Jesus's life, the Romans did not percieve Jesus as a threat, because the Jews were split amongst themselves as whether he was the Massiah or not since he wasn't leading an army to take over the Romans as they had expected.
2006-12-12 09:51:39
·
answer #2
·
answered by pantherpink25 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
I think some of it was a matter of time and place. Jesus and his followers didn't just stay out in some backwater - they went to Jerusalem where they could "cause trouble." Some of the Jewish leaders felt threatened for any number of reasons, including the fear that if the Romans got pissy, they would revoke ANY right to practice their faith. Since they had some clout with the local government, they were able to bend an ear. Then there is the whole story of Pilate and Barabbas... the crowd forced his hand.
2006-12-12 09:53:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Church Music Girl 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
Because the testament described in detail a leader of the Jews would be born and the Romans were afraid they would rebel.
That is why Mary and Joseph had to leave Bethlehem after Jesus's birth.
They were there for a consensus so the Romans would find Jesus and have him killed before He would start his church.
2006-12-12 09:53:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by dyke_in_heat 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
I don't think the Romans perceived him as it threat, it was the Pharisee sect of the Jews at the time. The Pharisee's were very legalistic and they couldn't kill Jesus directly without having his blood on their hands, but they conspired and had several mock trails of Jesus, basically forcing Pontias Pilots hand on the matter. I get the impression that Pontias Pilot respected Jesus after he heard him speak a bit. But to keep the Jews from rioting (because they were being stirred up by the Pharisee leadership), Pontias aquieced.
2006-12-12 09:48:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
This is all my own thoughts. Not out of scripture as most of my answers are. Rome didn't pick Jesus the Sanhedrin did. They wanted Jesus gone and used Rome to do their dirty work. They had no idea that Rome would turn it around on them and display Jesus "The king of the Jews" hanging on a Roman cross. The Sanhedrin thought they could use Rome. Rome tried to show the world that nothing was greater than Rome, and God used Rome to offer life to His creation through the shed blood of Christ.... Jim
2006-12-12 09:51:26
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
He replaced into somebody outdoors of their priestly circle whom the individuals have been seeking to as an expert over them. additionally, Jesus replaced into very frank in preaching against the abuses of the pharisees. So, it replaced into an opposed conflict wherein the Jewish religious hierachy felt their ability replaced into being asurped by employing somebody they have been rejecting by using fact the Messiah. i don't understand of something with regard to the Jews rejecting Jesus that contributes to the Muslim Jewish conflict, or different conflicts interior the middle east. Muhammad certainly wrote favorable approximately Jews and Christians interior the faster Quranic writings. yet then he had some wars with them and he wrote interior the Quran issues like kill the Jews and Christians everywhere you detect them, and if people won't convert you're to kill them. traditionally, those writings by employing Muhammad have fueled distinctive the religious combating over the centuries or maybe amoung Islamic terrorists right now.
2016-12-30 07:55:55
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The Romans didn't care. In Luke 23:4 - Then Pilate announced to the chief priests and the crowd, "I find no basis for a charge against this man." The jewish leadership at the time wanted rid of Jesus so Pilate caved in to thier pressure just to keep them happy.
2006-12-12 10:00:44
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sun and Sand 3
·
3⤊
1⤋
because of all the peoples that Rome had occupied the Jews were the most volatile and there had been many insurrections and riots, that the Romans were getting tired of it and had sent various Roman governors to Jerusalem to keep the peace and the last thing they wanted was another religious war.
Pontius Pilate was going to release Jesus but the Jews threatened to report him to Caesar in Rome for releasing a rebel who had called Himself King of the Jews and who had many followers,and so Pilate was afraid that this would harm his career.
2006-12-12 09:53:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sentinel 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
they would have perceived him as a threat because they would only been familiar with the jewish idea of the messiah and not the christian one. since some of the things the jewish messiah is supposed to do is boot out the oppressors (ie, the romans) and restore israel to the jews, they would have been leery of a guy claiming to be the jewish messiah.
2006-12-12 10:02:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋