I think if they keep on on direction they are having now it might be better to have a clausewitz type action and then just let it be and not let are selves get pulled into the actuall country with a neocon restructing program, what does any body else think.
2006-12-12 09:28:29 · 8 answers · asked by Misterflorida 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
There is no way to occupy it, a war with Iran would be much like the first gulf-war. A massive air campaign backed up with limited ground engagements.
I was able to translate neocon out of your gibberish. Just say that Bush will not be able to handle an invasion of Iran. That sounds alot better than that crap you tried pull off in your question.
2006-12-12 09:32:28 · answer #1 · answered by 3rd parties for REAL CHANGE 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
War with Iran would be a suicide. US is failing in Iraq as it is, and that country is tiny compared to Iran. Also Iraq lacks any solid economy, while Iran is quite prosperous, and would be able to fund any resistance much more successfully. Most of their fundamental national structures are much more developed than let's say Iraq, or Vietnam's were. US would have have an almost impossible time winning if it invaded on its own. Never mind that UN, and everyone else would be highly against this type of move. An air strike, or sudden desctruction of vital areas, like factories, and weapon facilities would be an option, but retaliation would be great. Iran has close ties with terrorist groups, and many radical Islam sects. Right now they support US's actions in Iraq concerning reconstruction and all, but that would change with any offense on their country, as they would use these ties to turn the terrorists cells against US troops and possibly civilians in US. There are many other reasons that US should deal with Iran diplomatically. It is actually very possible to solve this diplomatically using some economic threats instead of military actions. But I will not go into this now.
2006-12-12 17:42:25 · answer #2 · answered by DmanLT21 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. If there is a war with Iran... it would not really be with the people of Iran but the war itself would probably be headed by the Antichrist. Check out my question "Do you think the birth of the Red Heifers born in the 1990’s is proof that the Messiah will be coming soon? There is an important message for everyone.
2006-12-12 17:34:46 · answer #3 · answered by Soul saviour 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Surely you jest, what possible reason would we have for warring with Iran. YOU KNOW damn well Bush/Cheney and cohorts in war profiteering invented the whole crap up! Don't even consider allowing any such thoughts of them wrecking the world more.
2006-12-12 17:46:04 · answer #4 · answered by mary57whalen 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i applaud this question -
And no, I think occupying would be ANOTHER mistake.
Upset the apple cart from above and let the chips fall where they may.
2006-12-12 17:39:16 · answer #5 · answered by RustyOwls 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree, we can whop any country in the world, but we cannot OCCUPY it
if things get too bad, the people will rebuild themselves
2006-12-12 17:39:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think 51 states is ok
2006-12-12 18:31:26 · answer #7 · answered by Captain Jack Sparrow 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuke 'em smooth as glass.
2006-12-12 17:30:46 · answer #8 · answered by LoneStar 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋