In other words, if fate allowed them to be together would there love be enough? For example:-
1) Juliet was pretty dominating- Romeo spend half is life in the pub?
2) Jack and Rose -
3) Brokeback mountain guys -
What do you reckon?
2006-12-12 09:06:46 · 6 answers · asked by life_aint_a_game_10 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
Thats a good question! i dont think Romeo and Juliet would have because they were so young.Jack and Rose i think could have.Brokeback Mountain guys ,if the would have gotten out of the closet, I think so too.That gets you thinking....cool question.
2006-12-12 09:12:45 · answer #1 · answered by aliyah 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
in literature starcrossed lovers are meant to break apart.....fate doesnt allow them to be together...it is so that their love is inadequate....in reality there's no such thing...aftr a relationship fails ppl may call them starcrossed lovers and that would only happen if theres not enuf luv.
2006-12-12 09:15:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
tristan and isolda
For all the single ones out there looking for romance:
http://www.*******************/
2006-12-12 09:12:00 · answer #3 · answered by mr johnson 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
One will never know!
How about wolverine and jean gray?!
2006-12-12 09:27:21 · answer #4 · answered by Velma 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
think they were IN it for the thrill, maybe they would have lasted but who knows?
2006-12-12 09:15:41 · answer #5 · answered by jinx 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
whatever
2006-12-12 09:10:04 · answer #6 · answered by Butt 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋