It is correct, only I would say: AT the bottom instead of IN!
Instead of , there lived ... I would say: amid ... coral reefs the fish and the other sea creatures lived happily together.
It sounds refreshingly uncommon and a bit antiquated, like in a fairy tale. Lovely!!!
I wonder how your text goes on!!!
2006-12-12 08:24:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by saehli 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
At the bottom of the sea, amid the stunningly colored coral reefs, fish and other sea creatures lived happily together. That's how I would say it.
2006-12-12 16:02:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by Jennifer 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Could read:
At the bottom of the sea amid the stunningly colored coral reefs, the fish and other sea creatures lived together happily .
or you could also substitute amidst for amid.
2006-12-12 16:05:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by wvucountryroads 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds like you're talking backwards. Are you working with George Lucas on something for Yoda?
2006-12-12 16:03:30
·
answer #4
·
answered by vanamont7 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sounds a little strange but it is not incorrect.
2006-12-12 16:02:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by Love Shepherd 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Quite a long run-on sentence, but it makes sense to me. =)
2006-12-12 16:52:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Devin O 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
SO, IT'S POSSIBLE, ALSO THERE IS A FOOD CHAIN SO SMALLER ONES GO SO THE BIGGER ONES CAN LIVE.
2006-12-12 16:02:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
maybe some changes you need to make
2006-12-12 16:08:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Pinkigal 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is correct, but it sounds weird
2006-12-12 16:14:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋