Thank you Chippy, you said it well. I am a Christian and very proud to be one. I believe in the Father, Son and Holy Spirit. I do not have to 'make' you or 'prove' to you by your standards that I feel this way, you are not the one to judge the living and the dead. I do not have to answer or convince you in anyway, besides, you are not hear to be convinced, just to argue you point and find fault in others beliefs.
2006-12-12 04:44:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by NolaDawn 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
It is not a bad question, the syntax may have been a little off, but it is a good question. The way that I would of said it is. "With out using the bible as a denominator, what arguments do you have for god?" The belief in god is a belief based on a system that cannot be proved false. For all sciences weakness if an item is proved false then it can be left behind and a search for new answer es. Where is that with god. If there is no testing, if it can't be proved false, on it's own, where is the virtue in it?
B
2006-12-12 04:44:47
·
answer #2
·
answered by Bacchus 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I kept having the same dream, my husband and I were somewhere dark, but warm. There was a voice that kept repeating that one of us has to die and we have to make a decision who. This went on for the longest time. One night I remember saying that I can not leave yet because my mother would not understand. After that night the dreams stopped.
6 weeks later my husband died.
Here is another one. When my mom was in her death bed I went to have a cigarett outside. As I looked into the blue sky I saw a face looking at me and then at the bedroom where my mom was sleeping.
I knew that was ?? coming to pick her up. About 8 hours later she passed away.
How about one more. As my great aunt was passing over - we were all around her - she looked for a few seconds like a new person and she said "oh .....(names of her sisters) you have come to pick me up. And then she was gone.
One more I am on a roll.
I was not sure about something and on my way to work I was talking to God and said " if I leave work today and see 1 big cloud cross in the sky then I know you want me to wait a little longer". Well what can I say, as I left work and look up there were crosses all over. So I am waiting.
I hope this is what you were looking for.
2006-12-12 06:13:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by eidunotno 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dear truth, yes, I can. my case will be for the existence of Judgement day.
Would you Consider yourself to be a Good person?
Have you ever lied (even once--fibs, white lies, etc.)? Ever stolen (anything--the value is irrelevant)? Jesus said, "Whoever looks upon a woman to lust after her, has committed adultery already with her in his heart." Have you ever looked with lust? If you have said "Yes" to these three questions, by your own admission, you are a lying, thieving, adulterer at heart; and we’ve only looked at three of the Ten Commandments. Nothing you’ve ever done is hid from His holy eyes. Will you be innocent or guilty on the Day of Judgment? Listen to your conscience. You know that you will be guilty, and therefore end up in Hell. That’s not God’s will. He provided a way for you and I to be forgiven.
He sent His Son to take our punishment: "God commended His love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us." He was bruised for our iniquities. Jesus then rose from the dead and defeated death.
Your own so-called “goodness” can’t get you into heaven any more than mine could. Jesus is the only way to Heaven. He is the "Door," the only "mediator." There is salvation in no other name. How can you know that this is true? John chapter 8 says that those who continue in all things which are of God will know the truth and the truth will set you free. In other words, anyone who follows the Command to repent (turn from sin) nd trust in jesus, the Ible promises will know God, God will forgive you and grant you the gift of everlasting life. the moment you do, thier wil be no Doubt, you will know death has Lost its sting and that Gods spirit lives within you. it has nothing to do the involvement of Humans,science,luck or nature. it has everything to do with surrender to the Lord Jesus Christ.
God Bless
WDJD
2006-12-12 05:00:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by WDJD 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Nothing can be explained or proven without any involvement of humans, science, physics, luck and/or nature. So your question is absolutely meaningless.
As for God, God can neither be proven or disproven by any reasonable definition of 'proof'...but neither can many things we humans rely on every day. So what.
2006-12-12 04:40:28
·
answer #5
·
answered by mzJakes 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
atheists do no longer believe that each and every thing got here from no longer something. in reality atheism makes no declare as to how the universe began. it purely says that there isn't any reason to imagine that a god did it. the humorous element is, christians imagine the universe got here from no longer something. imagine about it, if i create a table, i do not choose it into life I somewhat ought to construct it out of fabrics that already exists. yet curiously god can create ex nihilo. so by their own definition we did come from no longer something. so besides, the beginning of the universe, the reason of the large bang itself. btw the large bang is a reality, all of us comprehend that it befell, we are no longer entirely particular why. i visit respond to this somewhat because i'm a physicist, yet this isn't appropriate to my atheism. the first element that one needs to get excitement from is that you received't get effective basic information the following. that's the project we run into at the same time as coping with intense ability physics. on the size of the quantum or the cosmological issues purely artwork otherwise. it truly is somewhat counter intuitive and a good type of the time there are not any words in human language to describe what's somewhat occurring. it truly is a international of gruesome looking math. it somewhat works, quantum mechanics makes predictions so precise it's going to make you go eyed, yet we can't describe it in human language because the guidelines of the quantum international, do no longer stick with in our international and vice versa. we do not comprehend how the universe began precisely, yet we do comprehend some issues. to illustrate in quantum physics you somewhat can get something from no longer something. it truly is a results of the uncertainty theory little bits of ability are created actually out of no longer something, yet they exist for this manner of quick instantaneous that it doesn't violate the first regulation. 2d, reason and result does no longer stick with the following. the mechanism that motives radioactive decay works this manner. you may have an result with out a reason, issues can purely take position spontaneously. so some options run alongside those strains, that some type of quantum adventure created the singularity. a nil quantity aspect that contained all of time and area and elevated from there. i comprehend it truly isn't any longer an somewhat pleasing answer, yet a good type of this continues to be theoretical and prefer i reported it defies well-known language and problem-free sense. even i do not comprehend it 0.5 the time. besides i wish that permits
2016-11-25 22:55:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
DO you believe in the Wind??? You can not actually SEE it.
You can see evidence of it, does that prove it exist????????
Hebrews11:1
Do you believe George Washington was President and actually lived on the earth? Did you see him???? Is there any " evididence" that proves this?????????????????????????????
EXACTLY!
HISTORY! Man recorded Man's History
God gave us his Inspired Word so We would KNOW of Him and The world which He Created. Genesis 1:1 John 1:1
Hebrews 11:6
Christian in Pa.
2006-12-12 04:44:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Penny Mae 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
The Kirk Cameron's Friend Banana Argument didn't convince you either, huh?
2006-12-12 04:54:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
silly question indeed. God created and set in motion those things that you mention. You make the question redundant and impossible.
2006-12-12 04:44:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by BaseballGrrl 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why are you putting such limitations?
You're basically saying:
Take away everything by which you can prove something and then prove it to me.
Why the limitations?
2006-12-12 04:43:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Uncle Thesis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋