I've heard it said that the stone age existed after the flood as a lot of resources and information was lost and the bronze age was before the flood.
To me this doesn't make sense.
Does this imply that the information age was in Eden and Adam and Eve had the internet?
2006-12-12 03:56:35 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
why do you focus on trivial things
2006-12-12 03:59:04 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't say anything. Some might say dinosaurs were dragons but that is bs. Dragons don't look anything like the various dinosaurs. There aren't any 7 headed dinosaurs either. There aren't any cultures that have properly documented the timeline. That's the biggest problem since it means a lot of the past has been lossed. The bible chronology doesn't even nail down a date on events and lacks scientific rigor. It is mostly exaggerations of real events (flood) or complete none sense like the genesis story. It doesn't even attempt to describe the various people : where are the Mayans, Olmec, Cherokee, Inuit, Australian natives, etc?
2016-03-29 04:31:02 · answer #2 · answered by Diane 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well I don't know exactly about the time periods for both the so called stone age and bronze age but after the flood happened the Scriptures state that Abraham used a flint knife to circumcise Issac. I'm sure the two so called ages overlapped each other.
2006-12-12 04:13:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Many believe that the world was once much more advanced than it now is.
I personally believe we are still living in primitive times...there are going to be things far more advanced than the Internet (actually already are). Things that unfold in the future will make the Internet look like StoneAge. Open your mind and imagine! That's the beginning of how new things happen and will continue to do so.
2006-12-12 04:09:36 · answer #4 · answered by Greanwitch 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
isn't it funny that folks that have some against the Bible Or Christianity always heard it from someone else? Not an original idea?
2006-12-12 04:11:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I personally don't belive in the stone age, despite any "proof" scientist can come up with, because I don't belive a man that built an ark (Noah) would be a caveman.
2006-12-12 04:03:59 · answer #6 · answered by Pulga 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
There was no Adam and Eve!
They are fictional creations like the bible God is a fictional creation!
Every culture has stories of a first couple but they are not factual only stories! Myths are interesting but myths are not FACTS!
2006-12-12 04:02:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I thought they had Macs and Ipods and used the Internet to swap MP3s
2006-12-12 04:06:02 · answer #8 · answered by Quantrill 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No and you shouldnt wonder about things like that read the bible and see if it answers your question
2006-12-12 04:09:23 · answer #9 · answered by honkytonk honey 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Maybe they had flying cars too. lol
HaTTa' :
You mean why does he focus on the parts of Christianity that don't make sense instead of ecnoring them like you do?
2006-12-12 04:04:16 · answer #10 · answered by A 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
"... and then Al Gore said: let there be fibre optic cable! Then a T3 line appeared... and it was good."
2006-12-12 04:00:07 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋