Poll for Evangelical Christians: Are you pro-life?

Question

Only vote yes if you oppose abortion, war, and the death penalty.

If you vote yes because you are against abortion but support war or the death penalty the you are a HYPOCRITE!!!!!

Answer 1

Well said. Being pro life shouldn't mean you can pick and choose who's life is better than others.
And that's what they do on a daily basis...

Answer 2

I am not Evangelical, but I am Christian.

This question fails to make critical distinctions between the justifications given for all three. It is perfectly consistent for a person, Christian or otherwise, to believe abortion is murder and the death penalty not. Murder can properly be defined as the unjust taking of a life. In other words, the fetus has not been found guilty in a court of law of capital offense by a jury of his peers. Thus ending the life of a fetus is without warrant when ending the life of a serial killer is.

The same is true for war. Just War Theory, started by St. Augustine, generally holds that war is just when defending one's land from attack. Thus, in order to save the life of a citizen, it is necessary and just to take the life of those who are attacking it.

Answer 3

Wow, now that's judging heart and motives. And I thought atheist and agnostic usually the one who says that Christian are judgmental. Now you're calling us hypocrite.. hmm.
Yes, I am against abortion in many ways. (especially the partial birth abortion) The babies are innocent, and do nothing wrong. Yet some women prefer to kill them. Think this way, you have an innocent friend .. He did nothing wrong, but there's a woman that doesn't like him to be around, so she decided to kill him. What would you do ? Prevent it to happen or just let her do it. Inside the womb or outside the womb, both have the right to live, both have feelings, both can feel pain, and both can wiggle their toes.
I don't like war, no one like war. But in the same time, I believe that our government have a right to protect our country. If your house got robbed one time, and someone killed the member of your family, what will you do to prevent it to happened again ? Either you put a dead bolt on your door or just let it happened again since you feel that the robber have a right to 'make' a living.So either the goverment prevent it to happened in our soil or put the dead bolt. I'd rather have a goverment (democrat or republican) that put a dead bolt in our door.
I don't like death penalty. If I had a choice I would rather have the person who commit a crime to be put in a hard labor for the rest of his/her life. Put them to death is just make it easier for them to get away from their action. While the victim still have to endure emotional and physical pain.

Answer 4

It's not hypocritical to believe in treating convicted felons and unborn children differently although I recognize the fact that numerous pro-abortion people wish it were.

Answer 5

in case you're professional existence are you for or against the loss of existence penalty? what's greater significant? The existence of an harmless unborn toddler, whose purely crime is to be inconvenient, or somebody who is going around murdering human beings? Capital punishment ought to purely be used in severe circumstances. I comprehend why some individuals are against the loss of existence penalty, yet no longer people who make the unborn an exception for their opposition to the loss of existence penalty. for or against war? war is aitch-eee-double hockey sticks. Invading Iraq in 2003 did no longer make experience. Dubya and Hillary all started a war because of the fact there replaced into supposedly a gamble that Saddam Husein might, nicely, initiate a war. If we ought to have wars, they ought to initiate an analogous way that WWII all started; with Hitler attacking Poland and Tojo attacking Pearl Harbour. yet each so often wars are mandatory. If we weren't prepared to combat contained in the 1940's Hitler might have forced people who he did no longer march into gasoline chambers to talk German. If we weren't prepared to combat contained in the 1950's, 60's, 70's and 80's, Stalin and Brezhnev might have forced us to talk Russian. If we weren't prepared to combat immediately, Osama bin Ladin could be forcing women folk to stay at abode and not allowing them to attend college or to teach their faces in public. would desire to war ever be justified? on condition that we are no longer prepared to have the undesirable adult men rule over us. for or against gun administration? Do i think of that ranchers and duck hunters are a gamble to society? No! Do i think of that we ought to continuously all be wearing hid firearms as though the gunfight contained in the ok Corral have been drawing close? No! what's your religios history; Christian, purely a Christian related to my perspectives on abortion; a million. Killing is misguided. (Exodus 20:13) 2. An unborn toddler is a man or woman. (medical actuality, nowhere does the Torah call for the loss of existence penalty for killing an unborn toddler, nor does the hot testomony call for disfellowshipping for killing an unborn toddler. i'm no longer asserting that Moses, Jesus or Paul might approve of killing an unborn toddler, yet that this component to my reasoning has no longer something to with faith and each little thing to do with technology.) for this reason, abortion is misguided.

Answer 6

The "cafeteria" approach is traditional. You pick the parts that you like and forget the others....

Answer 7

Double your dosage.

Answer 8

Isn't it funny how they're avoiding this question, just as they did my last one?

Thumbs up, friend.