I install remote starts at work all the time. Go with your car manufacturers remote start, it will provide a PATS(passive anti-theft) interface module, that will not disable the chip-in-key system. I've seen installations where the installer will get a 3rd key for the PATS system, break off the key part, and tape the chip section under the signal processor for the key tranceiver reception. This disables the Anti-theft starter lockout feature on your car. If your car doesnt have a passive anti-theft system, then installation should be a breeze; if you are good with wiring diagrams, wire strippers and a soldering gun. I dont reccomend using scotch-lock splices, as they can lead to the corrosion of wires, and have the tendency to fall off.
2006-12-12 15:45:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by JRfordtechnician 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on your car. A lot of later models have chips built into the keys. That means that an aftermarket system will require not only the unit which can be costly on new cars, but also a bypass and harness which doubles the cost. They also need to take one of your keys, pop out the chip and use it in the starter so it actually works.
My gf's grandfather had one put in his 1995 Chrysler Concorde. No worry there as he had no chip and it was $130 installed. My gf has a 2005 Jeep Liberty Renegade and the cost aftermarket is something like $400+ because of all the bypass and chip removal. But take note the systems usually come with keyless entry and alarms as well which on a new car you already have stock.
I personally am getting her the OEM kit from Mopar since it plugs right in and requires no modification to the keyless entry or key itself.
2006-12-12 10:54:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by DakotaPR7 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unless you are a car guru, I wouldn't recommend it. There are settings you have to adjust for the starter itself and if not done right, you can burn it out.
2006-12-12 10:52:17
·
answer #3
·
answered by Bobbie 3
·
1⤊
0⤋