English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

ause they don't want a new herd of perverts burdening the court system? What is the age of consent where you are? Do you think the Justice system treats sex crimes way to lightly? Do you think it is terrorism when the courts give incurable sexual deviants, house arrest, in a residential community? Do you think the Judges (who cannot be Dethroned) are perverts themselves?

2006-12-12 01:07:09 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

7 answers

14 here
all child molesters should be taken out and shot
save me the thousands upon thousands of dollars you will spend to judge them if they are quilty hands down

I have no problem spending .39 cent to take them on out and be done with it
If one was to mess with my child,They will pray like hel' in hopes that they cops get him before I do

2006-12-12 01:15:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

purely because a lady receives her era, does no longer recommend she is a lady or an individual. i comprehend muslims believe otherwise. I analyze an somewhat uncommon case of a touch female getting her era at age 3. The muslims on the area were commenting.....''She's fukcable at age 3 see you later as she has her era'' only for the list... i do not communicate this manner, i'm purely quoting what lots of the male muslims were preserving about this 3 12 months old female. So i'm preserving you're incorrect. Biology does no longer continually inform you once you're waiting to have sex... no longer by a lengthy shot! some imagine 16 is too youthful. they ought to no longer be reducing the age of consent. there are a kind of human beings that've regretted having sex as a teen. they provide the impact of being lower back and note now, that they made blunders... because they're mature adequate ''now'' to attraction to close, they were no longer waiting for it. we do not choose extra human beings residing to remorseful about their pasts. it truly is undesirable.

2016-11-25 22:36:37 · answer #2 · answered by wiltshire 4 · 0 0

Judges don't make laws and it is more imperative to lock up murderers than child molesters (sadly, there are limited resources). The justice system knows what it has to work with.

In Missouri USA it is illegal for someone over 21 to have sex with someone under 17 or for anyone to have sex with someone under 14 (or maybe it's 14 and under). There is no "age of consent" as far as sex goes.

2006-12-12 01:11:35 · answer #3 · answered by Phoenix, Wise Guru 7 · 0 0

LIGHTLY! In America, the liberals have almost gotten rid of any penalty for sex crimes. Most offenders get out on "parole" after only a few years.

I think they should be put to death, or at least locked up and never seen again.

2006-12-12 01:09:18 · answer #4 · answered by i hate hippies but love my Jesus 4 · 0 0

18 in the state where I am

2006-12-12 01:30:58 · answer #5 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0 0

looks like this old mans moving to Canada, anyone with a daughter got a room for rent

2006-12-12 01:36:04 · answer #6 · answered by boohamjad 1 · 0 0

Does it matter? Do you think that writing such laws on scraps of paper will change the culture or behavior of people?

2006-12-12 01:11:15 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers