English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I know everybody says a man v.s woman mma fight would be stupid, but if groin attacks were allowed wouldn't they domnate

2006-12-11 14:26:27 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Martial Arts

13 answers

Well they all wear Jocks so they'd have to hit pretty hard to really hurt them. I know alot of fighter fall to the mat when they catch a kick but mostly they are faking it for a little time to rest...
Also if Groin kicks are legal than hair pulling is as well so.... Again it comes down to overall skill and often dumb luck.

2006-12-12 02:06:26 · answer #1 · answered by Judoka 5 · 0 0

I would say no. First of all groin strikes are not the only method of fighting. The women would still have to contend with boxing, grappling, submission moves. If groin strikes were allowed the women would have to be prepared to get hit as well. I would doubt that a man would strike a woman's groin first but would most likely strike in retaliation. Males have been protecting their balls from a very young age and if groin strikes were allowed the men would use more methods of protecting themselves. Even wearing a cup a groin strike can be devestating but the damage is usually less. Women wearing groin protection would also feel the pain. I think it would be a stand off in terms of groin strikes. The only way women would dominate in MMA if groin strikes were allowed would be to have first strike at the man's unprotected groin. Other than that it would be an interesting fight.

2006-12-12 05:08:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

LMAO. If you pitch a 150 lbs guy against a 250 lbs woman, well, may be? As long as the weight class is in check it doesn't matter what rules they play by or not, the male animal will win 99% of the time.
P.S. guys that got kicked in the groin in street fights deserves it as they should pay the penalty for improper protection of their vernerable parts.

2006-12-12 01:00:57 · answer #3 · answered by minijumbofly 5 · 0 0

Groin attacks used to be allowed in the original UFC forum. Men even used it on other men. I don't think a woman would dominate, because it hurts for them to be kicked there as well.

2006-12-11 18:07:39 · answer #4 · answered by Mariposa 7 · 1 0

No, not neccessarily, if you've ever been hit in the balls when you are hyped up on adrenaline, you don't really register it until the end of the match, so it would probably be an evening factor, to make up for the biologically inclination for males to be physically stronger and faster. Of course after the adrenaline gets out of your system, you feel it, and it hurts, i would advise sitting down before it hits you entierly.

2006-12-11 14:35:39 · answer #5 · answered by Roy B 3 · 0 0

Not necessarily, because one they would never have a coed fight, it would always be guys fighting guys and (if they ever did introduce women's MMA) women against women.

and plus it prob'ly would be a disadvantage for a groin strike to be used because it can wind up being used against you.

2006-12-11 14:55:53 · answer #6 · answered by quiksilver8676 5 · 0 0

1

2017-02-27 20:54:30 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

the only woman that could even come close to beating a man in any fighting would be layala ali.

2006-12-11 20:58:45 · answer #8 · answered by bigpoppa_2x@verizon.net 3 · 0 0

Not true. as a woman, i don't really ''act'' like a stereotypical woman

2016-03-13 05:55:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

they wouldnt dominate because... payback is a sure thing, and the guys strike harder, or the guys could just go for the girls groin first, and have them fetal fast

2006-12-11 19:07:01 · answer #10 · answered by SAINT G 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers