2006-12-11 10:18:04 · 16 answers · asked by logan2012 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Any one of the foreign army, I mean.
2006-12-11 10:19:29 · update #1
Would that mean you are a terrorist?
2006-12-11 10:20:55 · update #2
yup i would fight bak to save my country
2006-12-11 10:19:32 · answer #1 · answered by bobji738 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It depended on who invaded. i mean if Venezula or Canada or some country like that came in, I wouldn't mind. Then, we might actually get the honest truth behind what our government is doing behind the scenes.
Yes, if you were to pick up arms, especially nowadays, if you kill any of the invading armies, the army will label you a "terrorist." it doesn't matter if you just shot the leaders or the grunts, i t wouldn't matter if you beleived that only some of the invaders were bad or if you thought you could kill them so they can go to heaven quicker; you'd be labelled a terrorist all the same.
2006-12-11 10:24:17 · answer #2 · answered by drecarter04 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Sure. It worked during the American Revolution. The Brits would line up like sitting ducks and Colonial marksmen would pick them off hiding behind trees and bushes. It wouldn't mean I was a terrorist, I'd be taking out soldiers, not innocent civilians.
2006-12-11 10:21:11 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would join my country's military or a local, honorable militia and beat the foreign freaks home.
Yes, I know this in reference to what's going on in Iraq. The civilians have a right to defend themselves from 'invaders' if that's what they think we are. They do not have the right to pray on innocent people to incite fear. It's not a civil war over there as much as it is a gang war, if you think about it. They have a government and a military. They should use it.
2006-12-11 10:35:00 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Would I hide behind my wife while trying to shoot the invading forces like the insurgents are doing? No
I would grab my 9mm and all the bullets I had and one of those big kitchen knives. I would go out w/ a little group of people and kill as many as those SOBs as I could before I was killed
2006-12-11 10:44:51 · answer #5 · answered by I Hate Liberals 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yeah, pretty much. Luckily we seem to have been blessed with never having to make that choice. I think we'd just use our military to keep them out of our civilian population, plus we'd probably nuke their home into oblivion. That was always my reason we should stay out of things we aren't in control of and be happy that we can defend ourselves and live in relative peace and quiet. We can't fix the world, we just do our best.
2006-12-11 10:23:00 · answer #6 · answered by jamisojo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The invading army would probably call you an insurgent and terrorist, but it is the right of any individual who loves his country.
2006-12-11 10:25:35 · answer #7 · answered by Naruto #1 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Do we have the luxury to be attacked by an army that does not kill civilians? Let us consider that in the same time, we kill civilians (Iraq, Yugoslavia, Lebanon, Palestine, ....)
2006-12-11 10:22:06 · answer #8 · answered by soubassakis 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Terrorists target civilians, not soldiers.
To answer your question, yes.
2006-12-11 10:58:01 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it would mean you are the resistance.
And the terrorists are killing more civilians than soldiers.
2006-12-11 10:22:17 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No I would not. That is called cowardice, and is a terrorist trait!!!
Does that answer your silly question?
Thank you very much, while you're up
2006-12-11 10:34:38 · answer #11 · answered by producer_vortex 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋