WHIICH IS RIGHT!?!?!?!
2006-12-11 06:46:36 · 19 answers · asked by ? 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
War4htelord,
OK?
2006-12-11 06:50:59 · update #1
Watching you,
Your're still in shallow waters. I'm asking for opinions.
2006-12-11 06:52:18 · update #2
ElevenEleven,
According to war4rthelord (from the bible), if you don't, you are a fool.
2006-12-11 06:54:15 · update #3
Say No to Jesus,
"No evidence for OR against"!
Either you're blind or schizophrenic.
2006-12-11 06:58:18 · update #4
Mathew,
That's what pinochio said.
2006-12-11 06:59:13 · update #5
Adam, Alex,
"Both"
You BOTH must be REALLY lonely.
2006-12-11 07:01:48 · update #6
Fireball,
That's what WAr4thelord said!
2006-12-11 07:03:07 · update #7
ANDY,
What IS right then?
2006-12-11 07:04:28 · update #8
Caommander,
Ask your OWN questions?
2006-12-11 07:05:06 · update #9
Allen,
I'm trying to.
2006-12-11 07:06:13 · update #10
elizabeth,
You've been hurt haven't you?
2006-12-11 07:07:06 · update #11
ERIN,
????
2006-12-11 07:09:31 · update #12
Darwin,
didn't ElevenEleven say, "It takes a fool to accept what they have been told."
DON"T BE NO FOOL!!!
2006-12-11 07:11:23 · update #13
Hillbilly,
I DO know.
2006-12-11 07:12:09 · update #14
I think you already know which is right. Look around you---everything gives evidence of the handiwork of God. All societies of the earth have an idea of a God, so only a fool will say, "There is no God". Says that in the Bible. Now, go and have a Merry Christmas.
2006-12-11 06:53:52 · answer #1 · answered by hillbilly 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Neither. In a huge book on the subject, noted Catholic theologian Hans Kung examined the question in excruciating detail, and concluded that neither the existence or non-existence of god could be shown using evidence or logic. I agree (for different reasons). There is nothing wrong with believing that god set up the rules by which the universe has run since the big bang, but neither this nor any other theory of god has any possible real-life consequences (that's proveable), so it is convenient to not believe in god unless you particularly enjoy the warm fuzziness of doing so.
2006-12-11 14:55:41 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both are right. If you look at people you realize that they are all fools. It takes more of a fool to not believe in God because of all of the evidence surrounding him. Something had to make you and evolutionists are having a real hard time getting those amino acids they worked so hard to make to bond together or anything. If they can't make life in a controlled environment like a laboratory what makes them think it could just form on it's own.
2006-12-11 14:51:15 · answer #3 · answered by girl of lamancha 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Okay, let me get this right. Believers have a book called the bible that teaches them how they should live and also gives them insight as to how God is. It also gives them a plan of salvation and promises of eternal life and how there efforts here on this earth can actually make life better for everyone,,while non-believers simply refuse to accept any belief of God. HUM,,I think I'll just keep believing. Besides, I'm still waiting on the genius to try to prove God doesn't exist.
2006-12-11 15:25:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither really I think. I don't believe in God but I wouldn't say that all believers are fools. Only those who are dogmatic and rigid in the belief that their idea must be the way God is, that their religion in the only truth, and those that wish to foist their beliefs on others or who condemn others for not believing as they do.
2006-12-11 14:51:01 · answer #5 · answered by Zen Pirate 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither one is a foolish position. It takes a fool to accept what they have been told. It takes a fool to believe they know everything.
EDIT I: I'm not sure the Bible is the most unbias, reliable source when it comes to these matters. It says a lot I disagree with.
2006-12-11 14:48:58 · answer #6 · answered by Eleventy 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
The second idea is based on a well known logical idea by Blaise Pascal. It also rests on a logical fallacy.
As for the first -- I don't believe that you have to be a fool to believe in God. I do think you have to be a fool to believe in Creationism, though.
2006-12-11 14:52:04 · answer #7 · answered by Ranto 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Neither is right. Disbelief is the default-the further you go from that the more untenable your beliefs become. For example believing in a God with human characteristics is more difficult to justify than just believing in a creator.
2006-12-11 14:50:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
A fool would not believe....the proof is in the pages....
Check out all these "non-believers" on the RELIGION AND SPIRITUALITY section of Yahoo answers, and try to conprehend some of their points.
2006-12-11 14:50:44 · answer #9 · answered by Allen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It takes a fool to think they have the truth. I personally don't know if there is or isn't a god. If there were a god and it wanted me to know then I am sure I would.
2006-12-11 14:49:29 · answer #10 · answered by Magus 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋