2006-12-11 06:10:46 · 6 answers · asked by breezejv 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Home Schooling
Beats what the state has to offer, for sure.
2006-12-11 06:18:19 · answer #1 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally I would have to say go to regular school. In regular school the child or kid meets new friends, stays socially involved. In regular middle school there's sports and teams that the child can be involved in. You learn more and are at a better pace than home schooled kids. Yeah doing homeschool you get out earlier but then you don't really have anyone to play with, or hang out with until regular school gets out.
2006-12-11 10:56:59 · answer #2 · answered by sailboat561 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In my opinion, it depends on which program you're using, how you use the program, and what you are doing to supplement the program.
Just like any schooling, it's not inherently bad or good - it's how it's used.
Which program are you looking at?
2006-12-11 09:42:28 · answer #3 · answered by TammyT 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think it would be great if we went to school for 3 hours, went home, and watched cool movies on what we're learning in class.
2006-12-11 09:07:57 · answer #4 · answered by the common cold 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it has + and -
saves money for the government
saves money for the transportation to & from school
but it is just another excuse for lazy kids to sit on their butts some more, espicially with no sources of gym class.
2006-12-11 12:10:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It could be really boring because you have to study by yourself and not see ur friends.
2006-12-11 06:50:12 · answer #6 · answered by BATGIRL 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋