They sit with the engines running for no reason.
They over-rev at traffic lights and junctions.
They hang their handbags on the choke lever.
They have bad gear discipline.
They get in the way.
They take too long to park.
They dither about on the road.
They've nice breasts though. (some of them)
2006-12-11 00:34:57 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Cars & Transportation ➔ Commuting
I think you raise a valid argument, but there are some other drawbacks to consider.
- We would not be able to exploit women for lower paying jobs in the workplace (men secretaries again!).
- Women would be home more watching TV which creates higher electrical demand and pollution (plus getting silly ideas in their heads from all those soap operas).
- Our houses would be cleaner, but the use of more cleaning chemicals increases pollution (but our dinner would be ready).
- Our birth rate would go up, exploding our population and compounding our pollution woes...but there would be more SEX!
Ban women drivers! Ban women drivers! Ban women drivers!
2006-12-11 00:52:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Lets think about your question logically. Does EVERY woman do all of these things? If so then you may have a point. However, in my experience many women do not. Are you also implying that there are no men that do the same? If that is the case then I assure you that you are mistaken. I know quite a few men who over-rev at traffic lights just to get a rise out of the guy with the hot chick in the passenger seat sitting at the light next to him, find it absolutely imparative to have the engine running for 10 minutes in the morning so it can warm up and they dont hae to get into it at negative temperatures, that take the catalytic converter off of their car because it "reduces horse power", go out and drive for apparently no other reason then to drive around, and take too long to park because they dont want to park in the back but wait for one to open up near the front of the store. All in all air pollution caused by motor vehicles can definately be reduced if both genders drive less or carpool.
2006-12-11 00:56:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Where did you get your license training? Male Chavenistic University? Men have their own groups of bad driving. Sounds like you had a bad experience. Some women are not good drivers, but the majority of them are good drivers. Check with the insurance companies. I am sure they have the statistics and would not mind giving you the information. If you are taking the time to examine their breast then you probably are the best driver in town. Being a female, I can assure you that I drive cautiously. I am sure that you do ,ALSO! If I were you and needed help while being on the road and a female stopped to help me, I donot believe that I would share that information with her or you may find yourself standing on the side of the road waiting for a male driver. to help you. Who knows maybe he will have nice breasts too.
2006-12-11 01:19:04 · answer #3 · answered by Jean 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Reasons for your complaint:
1. our engines are on coz men have a tendancy of carjacking us before we get the keys on the ignition!!
2. We have to drive our kids to their activities while the men are at "WORK"
3. What is a choker lever?
4. Some men are soooo cheap, that they cant afford an automatic!!! Yet they are "Working"
5. Yeah, who is over-revving now? huh
6. Get yourself a well-paying job, then you can have your own parking space.
7. Well, the dirty laundry we have to take to the cleaners for you stinks so bad its clouding.
8. Sorry, we cant say the same for your male members(kocks)!!!
On top of that your brainy questions are polluting your judgement.
2006-12-11 00:56:50 · answer #4 · answered by Nile Queen 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we were to ban women drivers it would help the pollution problem, but only as much so as if all the males were banned. Men have a tendency to accelerate harder, and that produces more pollution. But, I don't know why I bothered writing all that for a stupid question, especially one that was asked twice (at least)- maybe it was just for the two points.
2006-12-11 00:40:06 · answer #5 · answered by thomastalkson 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You don`t say anything about putting make up on,twisting rear view mirror to o do so or combing hair or picking breakfast out of teeth with same mirror or looking in purse/hand bag while
on th move.Honk at them to move off and you get the
obligatory two fingers.Or the soldiers farewell F Off.
And still the wife dose as she likes.
2006-12-11 00:50:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The answer to the traffic/pollution problem would be to ban MEN.
The vast majority of accidents are caused by men, who either go to fast and intimidate other drivers AND pedestrians.
2006-12-11 01:39:22 · answer #7 · answered by k 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No. That's the reason why they marketed the Ford Mustang with automatic transmission in the early 70's, so that the ladies can drive.
2006-12-11 01:46:17 · answer #8 · answered by glen 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
right here in u . s . a . of america we ignore that different international locations nonetheless have choke levers, more advantageous guide than vehicle transmissions and backward perspectives of ladies persons. Ask the question back once you opt for your mate to run to the save to purchase more advantageous beer for you. And who's going to take the little whinny knee titties to football prepare?
2016-11-30 10:30:21 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would the pollution problem be solved if men were kept in cages and only released when the need (women's, not yours) arises?
Oh, by the way, Dear...I am not into girls, altho with men (spell that a**holes) out there like you, it's probably the better choice.
2006-12-11 00:46:53 · answer #10 · answered by bcd95 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋