2006-12-10 23:29:44 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
personally do not think so as his predictions were written in such a way as to appear vague and might fit many different circumstances depending upon the reader's interpretation.
2006-12-10 23:33:01 · answer #1 · answered by Marvin R 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think he was one of the Great Comedians of all time.His quatrains have always been interpreted AFTER the event.Any expert who claims to be able to "read" them can only ever relate them to events in the past and when they come to future predictions,no matter what methods they use they are always so far off the mark it is laughable.
2006-12-11 08:06:57 · answer #2 · answered by jb1 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nostradamus is very dependable.
Look at quatrain 92 in his Centuries
Italy, son of Mars will ride a gaping mouth
World fire, and then all is not
Walker Texas Ranger shall for a decade pass
Till its watcher turns hateful, and casts it off
2006-12-11 07:33:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He said the world will end i the year 2000. Now start thinking.
2006-12-11 07:32:33 · answer #4 · answered by shadow_prophet2k6 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so... he was full of it (booze if you like) and he wrote a bunch of nonspecific things that a few weenies have chosen to twist and bend to make them fit into some of the bench mark events of recent history.
Nonsense... like Revelations of the Bible.
[][][] r u randy? [][][]
.
2006-12-11 07:40:54 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not at all.He should have stayed with medicine.
2006-12-11 08:09:52 · answer #6 · answered by gwhiz1052 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋