when i say how a beauty view, it mean there are ugly view too.
when i say that person is tall, that mean there are short people too.
when i say there is clean home, that mean there should be dirty home too.
when i say there is no god, it mean for sure there is a god.
2006-12-10 21:27:25 · 24 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Er, hon, that made no sense whatsoever. You're in way over your head.
2006-12-10 21:29:26 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
do you mean atheists?
;-)
p.s. well it's not an analogy. But it has some interesting idea. Which does not follow from what being said. But reminded me of this:
1) to say that there is no God one has to know 100% of everything that there is to know.
2) Knoweledge of God may exist in the 'area' of whatever % of what one does not know.
3) Nobody claims to know all 100% of whatever there is to know.
4.) Therefore, it is radiculous to say that one knows for sure that there is no God.
this is different argument... but let's put it here... :D
2006-12-11 05:33:55 · answer #2 · answered by kostas the ancient priest 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So when you say the sun rises in the morning, there must be somewhere where it doesn't rise in the morning
When you say the ocean is wet, there must be places where the ocean is actually quite dry
When we say that yours is the lamest argument ever for the existence of God, it means that......yours is the lamest argument ever for the existence of God.
2006-12-11 05:42:04 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Very nice thought. But Atheists know there is no 'proof' there is or isn't a God.
If is was Gods will He could prove himself to us all.
But God means for us to believe He exists not prove He exists.
.
2006-12-11 14:37:10 · answer #4 · answered by Twoeyes 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just one objection: according to your 'logic' (a positive claim first, its negative form then) it should rather be:
When I say THERE IS God, it means for sure there's NO God;)...Looks like you got caught into your own trap Miss;))))))))))))
Wrong example mate, very wrong;) the difference is just about universal and subjective concepts;)
2006-12-11 05:43:04 · answer #5 · answered by Love_my_Cornish_Knight❤️ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The question is the answer.
Can't have the outline of the mountain without the inline of the sky.
Can't know pleasure without knowing pain.
No Yin without Yang.
One hand can't make a clap.
All is one
This is it.
2006-12-11 05:41:07 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There is no unicorns, so there must be unicorns.
There is no Poseidon, so there must be Poseidon.
There is no Flying Spaghetti Monster, so there must be a Flying Spaghetti Monster.
I like this logic.
There must not be a billion dollars in my left pocket, so there must be a billion dollars in my right po... damn... there isn't because that's not how the world works.
2006-12-11 05:33:01 · answer #7 · answered by Alucard 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
The existance of GOD cannot be proven nor disproven, it is a concept in the mind of each individual beholder.
2006-12-11 05:30:59 · answer #8 · answered by a1952male 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
if i say that there is no beautiful view, does that mean that there are no ugly views?
if i say there are no tall people does that mean there are no short people?
i could go on but i can't be bothered. your logic is nonsense
2006-12-11 05:31:54 · answer #9 · answered by Nemesis 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
That's really the worst analogy I've ever seen. I would say it is the worst example of logic that I've seen, but it utterly lacks any sort of logical validity, so I can't even say that.
2006-12-11 05:33:27 · answer #10 · answered by The Man Comes Around 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
at some level it's true, but u can't compare all the things in world, and for sayin tht there is no god, u should have a faith in god, only then u can say there is no god.......
2006-12-11 06:28:14 · answer #11 · answered by Gaurav 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋