How are human footprints found in dinosaur tracks not a trick of the mind like the face on Mars?

Question

And does anyone have actual pictures? I just get links to creationist websites.

Answer 1

The "man track" claims have not stood up to close scientific scrutiny, and have been abandoned even by most creationists.

The supposed human tracks have involved a variety of phenomena, including forms of elongate (metatarsal) dinosaur tracks, erosional features, indistinct markings of uncertain origin, and some doctored and carved specimens (most of the latter on loose blocks of rock).

This site has links to a few articles:
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/paluxy.html

Answer 2

"After much research and study took place in the 1970s and 1980s, scientists proclaimed that the tracks were not of human origin. In 1986, the Institute for Creation Research published Impact, an article admitting that the Taylor Trail appears "obviously dinosaurian" and that "none of the four trails at the Taylor Site can be today regarded as unquestionably human." [1]. Since the article was published, many creationists have since rejected "man track" claims, although a few have held their belief. Most now believe that the man tracks are instead eroded, elongated dinosaur tracks."

Answer 3

common: none of them are authentically so. The purported guy tracks are in common words superficially human-like, and have a tendency to be extremely outsized. certainly, it really is particularly a lot as if they're really dinosaur footprints which have experienced heavy weathering. Then, there are the cases which have grew to grow to be out to be sparkling-reduce hoaxes... there's a reason the solutions in Genesis human beings have this highly listed on their 'Arguments we do not use' web page.

Answer 4

This is a proven mis-identification for the following reasons:
1) The "human" footprints referred to in the claim, are misidentified specimens of dinosaur footprints which bear a greater or lesser degree of similarity to human footprints. In some cases, Glen Rose residents have been known to artificially enhance particular footprints' similarity to human footprints in order to attract tourists' dollars.
2) Furthermore, the "human" footprints, misidentified or counterfeit, don't resemble human footprints, neither in size, nor shape, in the first place.
This is a false claim made by ID enthusiasts in order to further their claims.

Answer 5

Go to the Creationist Museum in Glennrose Texas. Irrefutable evidence that evolution is false. In fact they have more evidence disproving evolution than evolutionist have proof that it is true. Go and see for yourself. Don't take my word for it. Of course there are many who do not want to see the truth. That may mean there is a God that they have to answer to some day.

Answer 6

They aren't. Some people have alleged that, but under scrutiny the claims turn out to be false.

Answer 7

I saw the pics once, but can't remember the site.. Don't worry they are there. In Texas, why not just go down and see for yourself.

Answer 8

I am not bothering to write on this, here is a beginning link. good luck.
http://paleo.cc/paluxy/paluxy.htm

Answer 9

Good question but who knows.

Answer 10

It is a hoax!