God = not real See, I proved that God doesn't exist mathematically?

Answer 1

The concept, "Who is God" clears all ambiguities about God Almighty-


Who is God?

God Almighty... a cluster of pure energy is but the sum total of all souls (atmans) in the cosmos at a given point of time. The essence of every soul (atman) being the same as God Almighty... every soul is but a minuscule God in its entity.

The moment the big bang occurs... all souls (atmans) existing in the Cosmos spread all over the cosmos with unimaginable speeds. The magnitude and the scale of the big bang are beyond the comprehension of the human beings to visualize. Nothing that exists in the cosmos in energy form can be visualized by the help of the senses and the mind.

This explosion of the big bang results in creation of a new cosmos... a new beginning! After billions of years when some planets become suitable for giving birth to life... the souls start manifesting body after another. And a planet like Mother Earth is born.

Now... what is this big bang theory! The big bang occurs in what! As has been defined above... the definition of God is, "the sum total of all purified souls atmans in the cosmos at a given point of time is what we know as God Almighty".

This cluster of pure energy we know as God accumulates in its absolute pure state only when the dissolution of the Cosmos occurs in its entirety. It is as if a huge cauldron of fire... a massive black hole has reduced the whole of the Cosmos to the size of half a thumb. It is this stage when every single soul atman in the Cosmos in whatever stage of life it may be liberates after gaining enlightenment and salvation. There is just no escape for the collapse of the whole of Cosmos has occurred.

As has been expressed by Mahavira, the 24th Tirthankara of Jainism that souls atmans in whatever stage of life they may be... continue their journey into the next Cosmos exactly from the point where they stood in the earlier manifestation is totally wrong. This is where the teachings of Jainism are flawed.

Bhagavad Gita... the sacred doctrine of Lord Krishna distinctly clarifies this point. And it is logical that when the collapse of the entire cosmos occurs... the question of souls remaining in their position as such and transitioning into the next Cosmos after the big bang occurs is but a flawed parable that defies all reasoning and logic.

The point of difference where Mahavira went wrong in understanding the teachings of Bhagavad Gita! The reason why Jainism branched into a new thinking pattern as advocated and doctored by Bhagwan Mahavira (the 24th and last Tirthankara of Jainism) is evidenced here.


This cluster of pure energy... the sum total of all purified atmans in the Cosmos equals half the size of a thumb as has been clearly spelt out in the Bhagavad Gita... the most sacred doctrine put forward by Lord Krishna in the battlefield of Mahabharata.

Unable to contain itself for long... this enormous source of pure energy explodes with a big bang giving birth to a new cosmos... a new journey! God Almighty is the source and the cause of the big bang. This theory of creationism is unpalatable by Scientists all over the world. Why? Science demands proofs and in the kingdom of God... it is absolute faith (in the system of God) that rules.

To be able to visualize the system of God... the kingdom of God with the help of the senses and the mind is being hypothetical. It is just not possible! The prime reason why the kingdom of God and God Almighty himself is beyond the capture of all scientists of the world!

Albert Einstein was the only scientist in the world who tried studying Bhagavad Gita at the fag end of his life. He deeply regretted and resented not having ventured into the study of Bhagavad Gita in the earlier stages of his life. In a nutshell... the domain of God starts where science ends. This is in brief the definition of God Almighty!

If a grain of sand is an individual soul atman... the whole mound of sand is Parmatman (Almighty God). If a single block of the puzzle is an individual soul atman... the whole completed puzzle is God Almighty himself in its fully magnificence and cosmic glory. More on god here- http://www.godrealized.org/god/who_is_god.html

Answer 2

Supernatural not real? You might just disregard this, because you like your religious reasons, but, I'll keep trying anyway.

"Regarding St. Therese, in 1923 the Church approved of two spontaneous cures unexplained by medical treatment. Sister Louise of St. Germain was cured of the stomach ulcers she had between 1913 and 1916. The second cure involved Charles Anne, a 23 year old seminarian who was dying from advanced pulmonary tuberculosis. The night he thought he was dying, Charles prayed to Therese. Afterward, the examining doctor testified, "The destroyed and ravaged lungs had been replaced by new lungs, carrying out their normal functions and about to revive the entire organism. A slight emaciation persists, which will disappear within a few days under a regularly assimilated diet." These two miracles resulted in Therese becoming beatified. "

Answer 3

you got a lot of responses but god doent truly mean what you think any way suggestion read and study langauges of the bible words and there meaning in that time then compare there meanings to now youll see that nothing is as it seems mystery cant be seen only seeked if you want to truly prove there is no eternal spiratual father study all religeons possible first truly understand the nature of man and his/her religeons then practice calling out each spiritual father or mother or god be truly open to it and not some dumb kid looking for attention keep record of all your accounts and then after a real in depth study on it all you can write a respectfull in depth book on religeon and if there is a god or what ever noy and why you feel this way and so everything you say it with power and wisdom not out of random thought to get people rawled up but you did csatch qa lot attentetion for it brought up some nice views on your mathmatical equation by being sarcastic and somewhat amusing you seem as if you mightr even be a deep thinker prove it by displaying your true inteligance and gaining knowledge so you can display true wisdom as well david. haha i got a laugh out it all since your clever and witty do us and yourself a favor come up with A QEUSTION THAT WILL REALY CATCH OUR ATTENTION QAND HAVE US ALL RAIVING TA TA

Answer 4

I am a christian and I know you have the right to believe what you want. But you can't disprove something by probalbility but to be able to say that there is not a God you must prove there is one. That is what makes a good scientist, checking out both sides of the coin. Good luck with your search and may the true God, jesus christ, bless you with truth and intelligence my young scientist.

Answer 5

It will be interesting to see the proof that hell fire is not going to burn your tushy in the afterlife. What? No proof? Leave a little crack of doubt in your hypothesis so that if you are wrong you can run through the door of doubt and repent to Almighty God, your Father. Amen!

Answer 6

We cant see you.

Answer 7

The fool has said in his heart,
“There is no God.”
They are corrupt,
They have done abominable works,
There is none who does good. Psalm 14:1

Answer 8

David = Not Real. See, I just proved that you don't exist!

Your reasoning, of course, is faulty. You can't make someone or something not exist merely by declaring it so.

Answer 9

but can u prove evolution's real. can u prove that we evolved from monkeys? can u prove eart's a billion yrs old? no. u know what? GOd exists. u r the proof. i am the proof. we r the proof. the whole universe is the proof. !!!!!!!!!!!1

ya.

Answer 10

>are you able to coach to me that god isn't actual? No. >to me technology proves that god is actual better than it disproves it. First, technology would not deal in evidence in any respect. It deals in theories and evidence. each fact in technology is tentative. 2d, 'to you' is nearly meaningless. technology works the comparable way for all of us. it quite is actual which you would understand a different set of evidence than yet another man or woman, yet that basically skill one (or the two) of you has something to study from the different, not that your positions are irreconcilable. >God could have been created himself, yet if you consider that we can't comprehend his measurement then it quite is much greater stable to comprehend the measurement above his. it is large in itself. yet you nevertheless ultimately come decrease back to the comparable undertaking that something got here from not something quicker or later. the ingredient approximately 'what created God' isn't meant as a right away argument against the existence of God, plenty because it quite is meant to show out why the existence of God isn't a answer for the undertaking of the place each thing got here from. >this may well be like drawing a stick determine and thinking why that stick determine cant draw yet another stick determine That will improve the question of why God, being so supremely effectual, chosen to create beings who have been no better than stick figures to him. would not there have been plenty greater fee (of regardless of type) in becoming something greater effective than that? in spite of everything, we human beings do not spend all our time sitting around drawing stick figures, and God supposedly has much better intelligence and creative skill than we do. >in case you do not save on with god's plan then he won't be able to preserve you Why not? i presumed he grew to become into meant to be supremely effectual. >he did not create them that way, they have been those that the devil has inspired Then why did he create the devil interior the 1st place? It would not seem to have finished everybody any stable. >additionally, interior the thought of evolution, why did we get out of the sea? what grew to become into so incorrect with the sea that they had to go away. nicely, between different issues, there have been greater predators interior the sea. An animal that had to end while it have been given close to the shore grew to become into greater probable to get eaten than an animal that ought to climb out onto the shore and wait till the predator went away in the previous going decrease back interior the water.