I hate Kodak paper (their photo paper for inkjet printers). I have an older Canon S900 which prints pretty amazing photos, but have never been able to print well using Kodak paper. I've used Canon, Ilford (another really good brand that started in the photo business with film, and moved into the digital age), and even the cheap stuff that WalMart sells and they all work well in my Canon printer, except for Kodak. With the Kodak paper, the prints tend to be very grainy and if you look closely, you can actually see the individual dots of ink.
2006-12-10 15:00:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by jseah114 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would reccomend the HP paper. Its really cost efficient and looks remarkable. If you cant find that....Kodak has a photo printer paper line. Its a little bit more expensive....but you will still see great results.
2006-12-10 13:55:11
·
answer #2
·
answered by inquiringsoulbrudda 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have 2 friends that are pro photographers, one of them is a senior photographer for Fossil, and both use only fuji paper if that helps.
2006-12-10 13:52:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Chris the all knowing one 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I found 'FUJIFILM' All Occasion', photo paper, 20 glossy sheets, -$4.99
at 'Big Lots'
Yes, a rare find, but a good one.
Makes great pictures.
2006-12-10 14:05:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
They are all expensive.
Go for the Staples store brand.
2006-12-10 13:53:06
·
answer #5
·
answered by Raina 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
nope.
2006-12-10 13:48:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by cenaluvr14 1
·
0⤊
1⤋