Iraq & oil ! Was it morally worthy to attack Iraq on apr. 2006, for non existing Iraq's nukes or chemicals ! ?

Question

Was it worthy to terrorize & mutilate thousands of U.S. & Iraqi soldiers & Innocent Iraqi civilian & children ! ?
Wasn't oil the main & the only reason of attacking Iraq , & dominance for Oil ! ?
Isn't looting one million barrel of crul oil a day enough ! ?
* Is the Baker /Hamilton's report for creating peace in Iraq for makeing,
sure that the oil industry in Iraq is totally privatalized & controlled by forien,
Investers & not by the Iraqi people & government, so that more oil can ,
continueously be looted ! ?
Are we just & moral ! ?

Answer 1

Dude, our Congress has already been informed that we have found over 500 of the chemical weapon warheads that the UN inspectors could not.

Saddam is guilty as charged.

Oil is the reason Saddam attacked Saudi Arabia and Kuwait - and part of the reason we came to their defense. You will die without it.

Answer 2

It did not decrease the cost of oil. It did quite the alternative. human beings say that about bush because it truly is authentic. Bush became confident the Iraq's oil may pay for the conflict. The Iraqis did not enable him take the oil. On suitable of it, most of the pipelines in Iraq as been blown up. Making it much harder to get oil from there. So because of that the cost went up. If the U. S. does no longer have attacked Iraq the cost may have probable stayed an identical than it became decrease back then. i'm no longer keen to pay quite severe priced gas. i'd want take the bus.

Answer 3

Get off the Liberal falsified conspiracy theory beliefs. Learn for yourself, stop listening to the party line lies.

Iraq's arsenal of weapons of mass destruction was not captured by US forces who heroically brought down Saddam Hussein's regime three years ago this week. It vanished before they arrived.
Israeli intelligence reported before the US-led invasion that starting in late summer 2002 Saddam's WMD arsenal was shipped by truck convoy to Syria. Recently, documents seized from Iraq after the fall of the regime were released to the public. Those documents revealed that under the direct command of former Russian prime minister and KGB boss Yevgeny Primakov, Russian Spetnaz forces oversaw the transfer of Iraq's WMD to Syria ahead of the US-led invasion. These reports have been corroborated by Saddam's Air Vice Marshall General Georges Sada.

So rather than being destroyed or secured, Saddam's WMD arsenal was simply moved from one rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations to another rogue regime with intimate ties to terror organizations.

Of course, American Media will NOT report this, it will prove Bush right, and then they would look stupid.

Michael Moore, thanks:
Friday, 23 June 2006
When News Lies


WHEN NEWS LIES
Media Complicity and The Iraq War


By Danny Schechter, The News Dissector



A new book from Danny Schechter offers an up to date indictment of the role media played in promoting and misreporting the war on Iraq. It is an analysis of how and why the media got it wrong that pinpoints the failures of journalism and the collusion of media companies with the Bush Administration. The author of EMBEDDED: Weapons of Mass Deception (Prometheus 2003), an account of the TV coverage of the US invasion, returns with a more comprehensive, updated and insider look at the media complicity that Schechter argues "made the war possible."



"Most of the anti-war movement focused on the crimes of the Bush Administration ignoring the mainstream media, its far more effective accomplice," says former network producer Danny Schechter (ABC, CNN). "The government orchestrated the war while the media marketed it. You couldn't have one without the other."



WHEN NEWS LIES includes the feature -length DVD of the prize-winning film WMD (Weapons of Mass Deception). The book will also include the complete script as well as a discussion of the challenges of exposing media with media with a documentary. It chronicles the media war fought alongside the military campaign and the struggle to stand up for truth.

Answer 4

no, have no idea where you beleive it was for oil,

The US never took ownership of any oil, it still and has always belonged to IRAQ, If anything we stoped production for almost a year, so it had nothing to do with oil.

Answer 5

April 2006? Have you been in a coma.

Answer 6

this war is not for oil this is situped war . this is first time in the history there is war without any reason any one tell you that oil is reason for this war either situped or lier
THIS IS WAR WITHOUT ANY REASON

Answer 7

Did your babysitter tell you that story?

Answer 8

you mean the WMDs we found