Who thinks that Darwins theory of evolution is wrong? And if you think it is wrong, what proof do you have... And don't give me an answer that is based on religion.. I want to know real facts as why you would think it is wrong...
2006-12-10 10:27:33 · 9 answers · asked by Kirk D 3 in Environment
There is no difinitive proof that says evolution didn't take place. My question is this though... If we truly evolved from apes, then why do apes exist today? I can appreciate the reasons for believing in evolution since if you look at the caveman, he does closely resemble that of an ape. Perhaps something happened that we did evolve, some sort of atmospheric condition like a meteor or something that caused it to happen and that's why we no longer evolve. Perhaps God decided that apes no longer needed to evolve into humans since we procreate on our own.
I can appreciate where you are coming from, however, there are many unanswered questions in reference to the validity of such a theory. However, I question the bible as well since it's been translated so many times. Who's to say that the translations are correct? Ever play the telephone game? That's kind of how I see the translation of the bible, so the accuracy is questionable.
I believe that being spiritual and yet questioning how things happen is something that God would expect of us. We have the ability to reason, reflect and have our own opinions and feelings.
What is right or wrong is based upon how the individual chooses to view the situation.
2006-12-10 10:44:33 · answer #1 · answered by Nicole 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
a million) According to evolutionists, Humans developed from apes? Humans are apes by means of definition. Linnaeus labeled us as such and he was once a creationist. two) There are many confirmed tips in technological know-how, however evolution is only a thought. False because of a false impression of the phrase thought. A truth, in technological know-how, is a discrete factor of understanding. Theories attach tips and give an explanation for them. There is not any better class than thought. three) A transitional style is a fossil of an animal that's facet one species and facet yet another. False. All organisms are transitional. four) The age of the earth is discovered by means of scientists completely by way of the radioactive relationship of fossils ? The age of the Earth was once discovered by means of relationship a meteor at the assumption that the Solar System was once the entire equal age. All different calculations have compatibility the age observed. five) The clinical system starts with a prediction after which appears for proof to help that prediction? It starts with remark. Then a speculation is shaped from that remark. After the speculation is shaped, scientists appear for proof to help or falsify the speculation. 6) The thought of evolution entails the Big Bang? False. 7) To think in evolution is to think that lifestyles and topic got here from not anything? False.
2016-09-03 08:49:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The theroy of Evolution is sound, while large gaps in the record of human evolution are infered, the basis on which they are infered is bases on scientific principals that are well established, (genetics, Molecular Biology).
I neither reject nor embrace god/yaweh/allah/Vishna whatever. When pondering Science, especially theories and laws all angles must be looked at. As one possibility after the other is looked at and discarded, all thats left is the possible. Where we stand with the Theory of Evolution is not "does it work", it has and will, where the real arguement is of the several possible environmental stimuli drove our evolutions and at what rate did it happen.
2006-12-10 11:44:01 · answer #3 · answered by Rossghjr 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The theory of evolution is nothing more than a theory based upon very little information. Fossil records represent far less than one percent of data about life. Our own history is quite incomplete. There is definite evidence of adaptation. There is no real evidence of evolution. There are only hints and suggestions. There is definite evidence of extinctions of species. There is no evidence of a new species coming into existence. Again, the information is very incomplete. We haven't even explored the entire Earth. We haven't found every creature on it. Fill in those gaps and allow for much more data and evolution can be evaluated. People grab onto evolution more as a rejection of God and creation than they do because it holds scientific merit.
2006-12-10 10:35:45 · answer #4 · answered by Jack 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not wrong -- incomplete. Darwin knew where most of the gaps in his theory lay, and the theory has been fleshed out, especially through understanding of genetics and molecular genetics.
2006-12-10 11:04:06 · answer #5 · answered by novangelis 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Evolution is pretty much undisputed in the scientific community. For reasons why, see http://talkorigins.org/.
That site also has a list of claims against evolution, along with the scientific response:
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/
2006-12-10 10:32:01 · answer #6 · answered by David M 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we evolved from monkeys then why are there still monkeys around? Why haven't other animals 'evolved' to as high of an intelligence as we have? I laugh at people who believe this stuff.
To assume we came from little organisms and other thousands of years changed into what we are today. Yes I believe adaptations do occur but not from a bird to a four-legged animal.
And apart from that, what facts do we have that we have infact evolved? This is just based on obeservation and guessing. You can't believe everything you hear.
2006-12-10 10:35:31 · answer #7 · answered by Squawkers 4 · 1⤊ 2⤋
the theory of evolution is sound.
2006-12-10 10:30:30 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i think i pretty much buy into evolution
2006-12-10 10:29:36 · answer #9 · answered by kitty is ANGRY!™ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋