He is a deluded criminal. He wants to kill us all. He does not have our best interest at heart.
9/11 was an inside job. It was a "false flag operation" and the terrorists are in the White house. Read "Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11" if you don't believe me.
The facts are there. We have been lied to.
http://patriotsquestion911.com/
2006-12-10 12:39:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by mysticathiest 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
First of all we do not really know that Global Warming is a problem now do we? Until someone can prove it leaving no doubt, do we need to bother our President with it? Methane produced by cattle is far worse to our atmosphere than is CO2. Should we kill all the cows. Then why stop oil production? Greenhouse gasses actually produce a layer of protection from the sun. In typical liberal fashion though, blame Bush for everything instead of coming up with your own ideas.
2006-12-14 07:59:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by mbush40 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not clear just how much, if any, man contributes to this phenomenon. And that's the main glitch.
The laws have been enacted to clean the air with the overall environment in mind, and not the global warming thing, but, it really doesn't matter what the main objective is - it only matters that these laws are enforced and built upon.
It seems pretty obvious to me that we can't spew millions of tons of CO and CO2 into the atmosphere annually and not have an effect of some kind on our environment.
Perhaps more data will convince our representatives that we owe it to future generations to give them a decent place to live.
2006-12-10 10:49:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by LeAnne 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
First of all, the Bush family is in the oil business (as is Cheney), so you can clearly see why they really don't want to support anything that would jeopardize their businesses. But it is not only Bush, it is the majority of the government (ours and others). They are in the pockets of special interest groups, and they have nothing (financial) to gain by supporting any of the policies that could help reduce global warming. If they were they would be putting money into alternative energy, and more fuel efficient vehicles instead of WAR! Therefore it is up to us to do what we can. Solar panels & personal wind generators are available. You can even rig up an exercize bike to charge houshold batteris (or run your TV)
2006-12-10 10:42:33
·
answer #4
·
answered by Enchanted Gypsy 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
The #1 way to stop global warming is to stop or use less oil. Bush is an oil man and so are his friends. Any questions?
2006-12-11 19:10:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by Verves2 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bush thinks only of war, he has no time for the real danger. Maybe he's sleeping now, dreaming the death of saddam, but he doesn't know that everyone is going to die if the global warming goes on and on....
2006-12-10 10:28:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by Genadi 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
international warming is a fantasy all started with techniques from the liberals to scare human beings for his or her eventual votes. The earth is going with the help of this is personal 'cycles'. a lengthy time period in the past the earth replaced into warm, then got here the ice age, now this is beginning to warmth up back on this is personal. decrease back interior the 70's, liberals did a similar element except tell human beings about international cooling. Scientists presently admitted that we've little or no/no result on international warming. They suggested that no matter if all of u . s . a . of america stopped using vehicles for the subsequent 50 years that it ought to in elementary words make a huge difference of one million-700th of a level interior the earths temperature over the 50 years.
2016-11-30 09:59:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush has nothing to do with it.
As long as we have countries like India and China burning everthing from dung to unprocessed high sulphur coal and diesel without anyone raising an eyebrow, there will be a problem. Liberals would rather point fingers at Bush than find real solutions, just like everything else they do.
2006-12-10 10:26:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by missourim43 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Because of his ties to big oil. And he has enough money to think that he can buy his and his family's way out of the consequences. He also believes that he will not be around to see the problems caused by global warming.
2006-12-10 10:29:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by eilishaa 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
What people need to understand is that he can do nothing about this. We have to put an end to this. He won't tell the public to stop driving cars, or drive less for the environments help. That is our decision to make.
This has no relation to his connection to oil.
2006-12-10 10:44:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Squawkers 4
·
0⤊
0⤋