I don't think religion necessarily has to be involved in your beliefs of murdering a baby.Regardless of what my beliefs are I would still be against abortion.
2006-12-10 07:34:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by J♥R♥R 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are a lot of other people against abortions, not just Christians. I am a Christian and Southern Baptist and I was always raised that abortion was wrong and my family still believe that, but, I believe in pro choice that a woman has a right to choose if she wants an abortion or keep her baby. My husband and I are both Pro choice.
2006-12-10 06:46:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutly not. Christians are against abortion but so are amny many others. Abortion isnt the matter of christianity. It is the idea that life is being taken away! Media has supressed the idea that and has make it look like its good. Did you know: Media could make abortion look as bad as murder if they wanted to! That is a fact.
People, especially women are unaware of the process of abortion. The baby is sucked out from the woman and shredded. A baby as early as 2weeks can be recognizable. The arms, legs and body are formed. There are many non-christian organizations trying to teach the younger age now the process and facts of abortion.
There is a reason why abortion doctors are protected. Abortion is murder, that is unrecognizable by the simple fact that law prohibits exploition of horrid imagrey of abortion. It is illegal to show what is happening because of tramatization.
Many groups try to inform the non-pregnant younger age of what is happening in abortion. Government has been more lenient on those basis because the women is not under the pressure of pregnancy yet.
2006-12-10 06:32:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by kat 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
I'm a christian and I'm totally against it but it's not only Christians against it but many other faiths because its MURDER. The child is stabbed in its throat and killed. If you were a baby about to be aborted you'd say otherwise.
Go on this site it's all bout it:
http://www.nrlc.org
2006-12-10 06:29:17
·
answer #4
·
answered by l_xclusive2k6 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'm agnostic, and pro-choice with some exceptions. I don't support late-term abortions. I don't support abortion as a means of birth control. However I realize that to deny abortions to women who continually use it as birth control would also mean that we would deny the procedure to women who might need it (rape, molestation, or medical reasons). The way I see it, if a woman is continually using it as birth control, she will have to answer for it, not me.
2006-12-10 06:34:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Amanda D 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think there are agnostics and atheists who oppose abortion. I'm not entirely comfortable with late-term abortion myself, but I don't think it's my role to say exactly WHEN it becomes unacceptable.
Muslims are also usually against abortion.
Also, some protestants are actually NOT opposed to abortion. Presbyterians, for example, are pro-choice.
2006-12-10 06:25:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by STFU Dude 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
i think its just the christians with there outdated laws are the only ones against abortion
2006-12-10 06:27:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
nicely, the different 2 factors that spring to techniques pertain to probability to the mother's life and incest. increasing on rape, i will understand the argument of no longer conserving the unborn baby in charge for the strikes of a rapist. Be that because it may, different concerns touching on can contain that besides the shown fact that there have been women people who've had the capability and braveness to upward push above being raped and nevertheless bringing a baby into the worldwide, no longer each female is emotionally, psychologically, and/or bodily able to wearing a baby. In any of those circumstances, forcing a woman to hold a baby to term might finally finally end up being a loss of life sentence for the girl -- and all of that on appropriate of the shown fact that the being pregnant replaced into compelled upon her interior the 1st place (via violence, via drugging, etc.). think of, as an occasion, a psychologically frail female pregnant via rape -- and exhibiting -- and individuals springing up and asking, "who's the fortunate father?" or, nicely-meaning human beings extending congratulations. certainly, is there justification for forcing a being pregnant on somebody who, for despite the clarification, isn't able to wearing the baby to term whilst the being pregnant replaced into compelled upon her? think of being a woman who, from her attitude, is dealing with a loss of life sentence because of fact if it comprises her life or a rapist's baby, she is seen insignificant somewhat. Conversely, some incentive classes such as, yet no longer constrained to, unfastened medical care, the two prenatal and later on, and psychological wellbeing care might help women human beings make the alternative freely to hold the baby. bear in techniques that i've got not got super medical expertise; interior the case of incest, i've got heard that some genetic medical circumstances are recessive characteristics, and those recessive characteristics could be paired in an incest being pregnant. some all of us is little ones of incest family and have grew to become out to be prevalent human beings different than having to triumph over the certainty of how they have been conceived. different individuals have not been so fortunate. i assume that this might come into the debate of whether or no longer a individual with severe deformities or retardation which includes that from Down Syndrome are entitled to a precise to stay. i'm hoping that there might have been something clever right here for you. And, i'm hoping which you do nicely alongside with your paper. God bless.
2016-10-14 10:01:58
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are many Non-Chritians who are agianst abortion. It all depends on whether you believe an unborn baby is real baby, or just a clump of cells.
2006-12-10 06:27:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by Melissa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
There are others, just like there are some christian groups who see nothing wrong with it. It's a matter of opinion.
2006-12-10 06:30:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Eaglesguy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋