A priest who is very knowledgable about stigmata and even knows a stigmatist told me that when people get stigmata the blood bleeding from their wounds is not of their blood type, and it is always O+ (apparently Jesus was O+ too because that is what is on the Shroud of Turin). Not that I am even remotely holy enough to be blessed to be afflicted with stigmata, but I am O+ too. Does that mean that I would never get stigmata?
2006-12-10 05:12:40 · 6 answers · asked by Rat 7 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
It means nothing of the sort. If you were so chosen, it would not matter what your blood type is.
2006-12-10 05:18:40 · answer #1 · answered by Firespider 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, you would never get stigmata. And nobody would ever get stigmata. It's a cool movie and a spooky fake ailment, nothing more. Just like demonic possession.
2006-12-10 13:15:17 · answer #2 · answered by ....... 4 · 2⤊ 5⤋
From the Greek "stigma" denoting a mark which has been burned or tattooed into the skin. Your question is based on pure fiction.
2006-12-10 13:20:31 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Depends IF YOU ARE STARING in a Hollywood Movie?
Thanks, RR
2006-12-10 13:17:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Post a link to a paper in a medical journal that verifies that. You won't find it because it isn't true.
2006-12-10 13:27:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
I agree with amber....
2006-12-10 13:16:15 · answer #6 · answered by Tomoyo K 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋