2006-12-10 05:04:48 · 19 answers · asked by ladylamp 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I'm of the mind frame if you are going to do something, then do it right or don't do it at all.
So, either he sends more troops to get Iraq under control or get out so Americans stop dieing for a losing cause that he isn't willing to fix.
2006-12-10 05:08:20 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 6⤊ 5⤋
This is a really hard question because 1st of all, this question is the exact question the Iraq study group is working on. Unfortunately, as Gates said and many other politicians have said we are not winning the war, there is no plan really in Iraq, and it is getting worst by the day, BUT if the troops DO get out then it will be 10x worse. So do we care for ourselves and our troops, or do we care TOO much about other countries. Its hard to determine. Put I do believe we should bring our troops out.
2006-12-10 05:12:02 · answer #2 · answered by Princess P 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
All that we're doing now is trying to keep the entire Near-East from getting into a really big civil war. We're not the enemy, we're the scape goat, the excuse.
The fracas in Iraq is about power, who will be the next dictator ? All we're doing is trying to keep the different Iraqi factions apart. They're not trying to help themselves.
The only answer that I can come up with would be to tell the Iraqi president that if he can't run his country, as all other countries are run ( without foreign help or interference ) he'd better resign to someone who can, because we can't prop him up indefinitely. I'd tell him that we want to see progress, a lot of it, day by day- - - or let the civil war begin.
2006-12-10 06:00:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is just a group of tribes that was made into a country and will keep fighting each other America is making it worse. I reckon Bush doesn't want to admit it is a lost cause like Vietnam was and he doesn't want to be remembered for lieing about going to Iraq and then having to pull out so I think he should pull out because he's already hated for it. Also the longer they're in Iraq the more movies they can make
2006-12-10 05:14:20 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes it is time but it has to be done in an organized and controlled manner. Simply withdrawing the troops will cause chaos, there must be an organized transition from our military to theirs. President Bush needs to listen to the American people and he needs to listen to the report on Iraq that just came out and take action. Business as usual is getting us nowhere fast and changes must take place soon.
2006-12-10 05:12:36 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
bruce J stated "9/11 replaced into an remoted experience." the place is he from?...for whether it relatively is earth then he needs to study some historical past commencing with the Muslim Brotherhood interior the 1920,which has stepped forward into numeerous terrorist communities and have been inflicting assaults for some years now. the individuals who say that GWB created the terrorist would be in for a impolite awakening. if a Dem is elected and wil be bowled over that Bush's leaving did no longer remedy this subject. they are going to little doubt, conintue to place the blame on Bush and lament the clarification the Dem's can no longer fix it relatively is Bush's fault. "The conflict we are witnessing world extensive isn't a conflict of religions, or a conflict of civilizations. it relatively is a conflict between 2 opposites, between 2 eras. it relatively is a conflict between a mentality that belongs to the middle a protracted time and yet another mentality that belongs to the twenty first century. it relatively is a conflict between civilization and backwardness, between the civilized and the primitive, between barbarity and rationality. it relatively is a conflict between freedom and oppression, between democracy and dictatorship. it relatively is a conflict between human rights, on the only hand, and the violation of those rights, on different hand. it relatively is a conflict between people who cope with women human beings like beasts, and people who cope with them like people. What we see at present isn't a conflict of civilizations. Civilizations do no longer conflict, yet compete." with the help of Wafta Sultan
2016-10-14 09:55:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Iraq is a problem, but we can't cut in run. the real problem is we fight or wars with rules that know one else follows. If i was captured in Iraq ,my fate is death (beheaded) but if i take a prisoner I must treat him with all do respect...its not the military fighting this war, there hands are tied,its the politics. there to worried about polls and elections. I think our military should be aloud to do its job with no interfearance from political parties, but full support...Been there.
2006-12-10 05:37:13 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
No. Change or fine tune policy? Maybe. We need to see this through and not cut and run. I think we are starting to see the name of the game so to speak. Something has to be done to curb the terrorist collective mind or the problem will always be there. Sticking your head in a hole will not make the problem go away. It's obvious these people are at our throats and our freedom is at stake. President Bush needs constructive ideas and support not all this crap people throw at him.
2006-12-10 05:19:30 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, or at least not all of them.. because you cant leave retards unsupervised....and I always hear ignorant people saying "when are we going to get out of iraq" are they so dumb that they dont realize we still have troops overseas in germany from the world war?
2006-12-10 05:10:33 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
I believe troops will always be there. We still have troops in Germany, Japan, South Korea and even Kosovo.
2006-12-10 05:08:27 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋