English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

This is a question on sound quality and my desktop computer.

Does data(cd or dvd) format give you the same 5.1 surround sound quality as actual(cd or dvd) format.

The reason i am asking is because i am planning on getting some 80watt surround sound speakers.

Also through 5.1 surround sound speakers, can you still give 5.1 surround sound even if some videos don't state surround sound, or is pretty much every video in surround sound now.

Also is 7.1 surround sound any different than 5.1, or is it just more speakers.

By the way, if i am not interested in bass, i'm just interested in surround sound only, is 80watt speakers good for a 10 by 11 room. Also can i get good surround sound with those kinds of speakers. Also can sound blaster card improve sound quality. The sound blaster card i am talking about is only $30 and i can get it from walmart. Its the Audigy Sound Blaster by Creative.

2006-12-10 04:02:24 · 2 answers · asked by Sherman81 6 in Consumer Electronics Home Theater

2 answers

A very good question.

Lossless data audio stream compressed is equivalent to audio CD quality. Even if the audio content has been converted to CDA (CD Audio) on your computer, there’s no difference at all.

That said, the quality of the conversion of your audio content material has to do with many factors: noise generated from other components in your computer, the quality of your motherboard, the quality of your CD drive, and the quality of your audio sound card.

Spending $30.00 dollars on a sound card will not give you the same quality compared to a more expensive sound card. There are sound engineering studio cards that can cost thousands of dollars if you’re really serious regarding audio quality, but that’s in a whole league by itself.

What I hope is being discussed is getting the same audio quality compared to CD audio whether it is saved as MP3, WMA, AAC or other compression format on your computer. You can obtain the same CD audio quality by using lossless compression format in MP3 or WMA’s, etc. The original audio content on your CD is another factor as to how well the audio engineering was made.

Saving a 5.1 audio track on your computer from a CD or DVD audio will not cause any difference in sound quality depending, however, that you’ve invested on a good sound card and a motherboard. As a rule of thumb, you would want to install your sound card the farthest away possible from your video card. Surround sound was developed by Dolby Digital Laboratories and if the content doesn’t specifically state Dolby Digital, you won’t get Dolby Digital. You will not get Dolby Digital from a surround sound because Dolby Digital sends all 5 plus 1 discrete audio channels to each speakers. As with surround, the rear audio sounds are mono.

7.1 surround, or if you’re referring specifically to 7.1 Dolby Digital will sound different over 5.1. This is due to independently discrete audio channels that are created during recording to produce unique audio effects. For example, watching Star Wars Revenge of the Sith in 7.1 compared to 5.1 is a huge tremendous difference. In several scenes while watching the movie in 7.1, you can hear the very smooth transition of spacecrafts coming from the center rear and moving outward to the L and R rear speakers.

Even though your room size is relatively small, I will suggest getting a more powerful powered subwoofer which can handle the low frequencies which your satellite speakers will not handle too well. A subwoofer of about 250-300 watts should suffice. You can then configure your subwoofer to determine what crossover frequencies it should handle to eliminate the “boom” effect as a result of your small listening area; in addition to turning down the powered subwoofer’s volume, you’ll be able to create a decent balance. I will strongly suggest getting a sound pressure level to calibrate your speakers.

2006-12-10 05:07:08 · answer #1 · answered by Sephiroth 2 · 0 0

on your reported funds, I actually consider Rugratzzzzz... yet ordinary, while thinking *in undemanding terms* video high quality, the storage media is beside the point. The record form saved to the storage media is the challenge. extra compression discards extra video archives and decreases video high quality. much less compression discards much less video archives and will strengthen video high quality. it is why the exterior not undemanding disc drives from concentration advancements (FireStore sequence) are stable. The hook up with camcorders with a firewire connection. The keep DV, HDV, DVCPro and DVCPro HD. And the Sony exterior memory unit saves DV. HDV, HDCAM and XDCAM video format. All are low compression formats. DV and HDV (25mbps archives circulate) are the only formats utilized in miniDV tape camcorders on your funds. AVCHD compressing camcorders (not undemanding disc force and flash memory) are extra standard of shopper grade severe definition video catch at 17mbps to 24mbps archives circulate. The 24mbps instruments do an ok activity and a few "professional" instruments use that. yet with the prevalent subjects not undemanding disc drives have with vibration and severe altitude, and not being waiting to tell the way forward for the place you're wanting to catch video... and the fast action video catch issues and a challenge with archiving the video they're actually not worth it. you're able to do the $/gig storage math... on your funds, for HDV, i think the Sony HDR-FX7. strengthen your funds and take a inspect the Canon XHA1 and Sony HDR-FX1000 (a "prosumer"), yet nonetheless a stable camcorder).

2016-12-11 06:16:30 · answer #2 · answered by jeniffer 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers