English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Win by Attrition.
Everone wants a nuke. Why not remind the world how they work, and what they do. Why do we not rain down hellfire on them? not from a sub, a ship, or a land base. But from portable launchers in space that just sit and wait for the target to pass by?

2006-12-10 03:39:35 · 11 answers · asked by NIGHTSHADE 4 in Politics & Government Military

11 answers

Sure, blow them all to mars. They spend most of their time killing each other anyway. We should help expedite the process. The only problem with giving 30 days notice is that the guys behind all the terrorism will be long gone by the time you bomb. They are cowards who just love the power of telling someone to carry out a mission and then watch the bodies pile up. I think some of them believe it makes them like a GOD (a true leader would sacrifice himself to the cause. Martyr himself. There is nothing a fanatic loves more than an "important martyr".)
I kind of like the mother bomb Idea. I saw one on the movie OUTBREAK. Sucks all the oxygen into itself and then explodes outward. Not too effective on underground targets, but nice if you want to kill everything in the area and then move right in when the smoke clears. Kind of expensive to blanket the whole country, but hey, can't have a cause with no living followers. Makes them kind of impotent. (a snake can't do much damage with no body and no fangs) I'm positive they wouldn't sacrifice themselves even if we told them that we would spare their people. (Even though it would give them the ultimate status as martyr) Unfortunately you could never get the leaders of the rest of the world to go along with it. They'd all cry foul and start WW 3.

2006-12-10 04:12:51 · answer #1 · answered by bookworm 2 · 1 1

Bad idea... remember all those oil fields there? The ones that supply half the petroleum to the world? The petroleum that is used to make everything from gasoline to plastic to fertilizer? Your plan would mean you'd pay $10 per gallon to drive to the store to find that food prices have tripled, too.

2006-12-10 03:49:13 · answer #2 · answered by Ralfcoder 7 · 2 0

You've been watching the James Bond movie Goldfinger with Sean Connery haven't you ?

Calm down my friend - It's just a movie

2006-12-10 03:48:21 · answer #3 · answered by old_man_blanco 2 · 0 0

I say we just get all the children out of there and Hiroshima the rest of them like we did to Japan in W.W II. It's harsh yes, but at least they will stop blowing our country up. I'm not saying its right and I'll expect alot of thumbs down for this but oh well. This go around they attacked us first. I'm tired of the war, We (bush) needs to put a stop to it.

2006-12-10 03:47:48 · answer #4 · answered by Danelle 5 · 0 2

Do you seriously believe that killing people, or destroying their homes and lives and leaving them as permament refugees will solve your problems? Did it work for Hitler? Did it work for Pol Pot? Or any of the other people who advocated genocide "for the greater good", or for the safety of their people? Do people view them as lovable rogues who just got it wrong? No. They view them as inhuman monsters, and with good reason.

2006-12-10 03:58:09 · answer #5 · answered by Mordent 7 · 1 0

That's an unbelievably stupid fu*king idea. But it's good for 2 points.

2006-12-10 04:06:24 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Your house first.

2006-12-10 03:43:06 · answer #7 · answered by FaerieWhings 7 · 0 0

to many goody goody people would wine

2006-12-10 03:41:49 · answer #8 · answered by Chuck & Christy N 3 · 0 2

3................2.......................1..............LAUNCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BUT ONLY GIVE THEM 24 HOURS TO CLEAR OUT

2006-12-10 03:49:31 · answer #9 · answered by dalizking 2 · 0 1

Are you retarded?

2006-12-10 03:41:38 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers