What is the first recorded case of not inbreeding?
2006-12-10 03:37:22 · 13 answers · asked by Dana G 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Everyone except Sean seams to be in denial. The bible was obviously written for inbreeds by in breeders. FIBI
Cain and Abel married their sisters as their main spouses.
WE skip to Abraham who had no daughters so he had his sons go to marry their cousins.
Then we skip to Salomon who married his mother.
Those are just highlights. In all cases, the bloodline of the HOLY people mated with their sisters, mothers, daughters, granddaughters, daughters-in-law, great grand daughters, and this is just the heterosexual sex.
boots and gary........ hahaha
2006-12-11 05:33:48 · answer #1 · answered by dirty_white_boy 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is a good source of history it records what people actually did. When speaking on what should be done see: Torah it is against inbreeding. Inbreeding genetically becomes problem in isolated groups so for Cain and Seth who's wives would have been from the sisters there is no problem (the science not the taboo) The genetic pool is cut in 1/2 every generation.
Ps, Nod the land of, mean exile in Hebrew. It was proably named that by the exiles them selves for you Moses is writing it many years later.
It can not, nor dose it claim to be a history of the Jews but of the world. Adam & Eve , Noha, and yes Abraham were not Jews.
2006-12-10 04:00:16 · answer #2 · answered by sean e 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
distinctive the guidelines have been symbolic of what Christ could do on the bypass like the sacrificial rules. So those rules have been performed or fulfilled. Hebrews 10:a million For the regulation, having a shadow of the solid issues to come back, and not the very photograph of the flaws, can by no potential with those self same sacrifices, which they provide continually 3 hundred and sixty 5 days by employing 3 hundred and sixty 5 days, make people who attitude appropriate. Hebrews 10:11 and each priest stands ministering on a daily basis and offering many times a similar sacrifices, that can by no potential get rid of sins. 12 yet this guy, after He had presented one sacrifice for sins perpetually, sat down on the ideal suited hand of God, 13 from that element waiting till at last His enemies are made His footstool. 14 For by employing one offering He has perfected perpetually people who're being sanctified.
2016-12-30 05:28:15 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Inbreeding? Now that is a new drum for you computer cowards to beat. Never thought you could sink this low. But I guess you just constantly have to prove the old saying that people fear what they do not understand.
Say hi to your wife and sister. One stop shopping for you.
2006-12-10 04:49:15 · answer #4 · answered by Jimfix 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Every human on Earth is related no matter if you are a Christian or an Evolutionist. What do you mean by not inbreeding. Are you hooking up with your cousin or something? xx
2006-12-10 03:46:47 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
the first recorded case of not inbreeding was the marriage of cain to his wife in the book of genesis in the bible.
2006-12-10 03:46:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Right after God, through Moses, declared "inbreeding" as a sin!
2006-12-10 03:44:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
If you are referring to Cain and Abel, you need to do a little more research...It states in the Bible that "they went to the land of Nod to get wives"...Seems like everyone misses the point that the Bible is not necessarilly a history of man, it's a history of the Hebrew nation. Does this help you?
2006-12-10 03:42:23 · answer #8 · answered by boots 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No, there are actually some laws against it. Check out Leviticus.
They did it in the beginning, and it was wierd I'll grant you, but the law changed that.
2006-12-10 03:43:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
"... They that are unlearned and unstable do wrestle, as they do other Scriptures, to their own destruction". (II Peter 3:16)
Thanks for proving the Bible true.
2006-12-10 03:42:49 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋