2006-12-10 01:07:36 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
"F" the third world. Why should it have gone outside the USA? $1,083.00 could be given to all American Citizens. IMHO the 3rd world can go drop dead, we have been feeding and taking care of them since I can remember the first ad on tv. Time to realize it is an unwinnable quagmire and let nature take it's course with them.
2006-12-10 01:10:53 · answer #1 · answered by pedohunter1488 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nothing, b/c even if we wouldn't have invaded iraq that money wouldn't have been spent on the 3rd world.
they are poverty stricken and there isn't much to do about it. htere is a class system established in the world and it would be great if it wasn't that way and we could all live happily together, but that's just not how it works, so let it go.
just being a realist.
take care.
2006-12-10 10:19:02 · answer #2 · answered by joey322 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
for the children who die around the world from not getting a pill a day,to all the malnurished kids,I think we could of helped everyone.(this even pays for the Admin that would go along with it.)Not to mention help alot of areas within America whos people suffer in a third world enviroment,that money would be pumped right back into the economy.Lets get our country rolling again,and if it means less trade so be it.Quit shopping at "China"I mean walmart and start buying more american goods.
2006-12-10 09:49:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The hell with the Third World - what could that have done for America? Giving it to the Third World ensures 95% of it goes into some fat cat's Swiss bank account.
2006-12-10 11:05:22 · answer #4 · answered by iwasnotanazipolka 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would, most definitely start to think of any other country, in the money sense, when and ONLY AFTER, I had taken care of America's own social service problems, and additionally giving a head start, in fixing our social security program, an action that is needed to avoid the depletion of funds by fiscal year 2028.
2006-12-10 09:32:43 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it could have been spent on science researches to look for a renewable source of energy that replaces the oil! after all the Iraqi war was initiated because everybody is trying to get thier hands on oil-rich countries. 325 billion... spent by stupid people who dosent see further than thier noses!
2006-12-10 09:14:41 · answer #6 · answered by enas_nanosa 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Prefer the money be spent on Americas needs.
this link provides a running tally of the cost of Iraq war.
It increases continuously
http://nationalpriorities.org/index.php?option=com_wrapper&Itemid=182
2006-12-10 09:22:05 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing at all. At least with Iraq there is oil at stake. Third world nations like Indonesia don't have zip.
2006-12-10 09:10:42 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It could have been spent on education within the US so people here on Yahoo! Answers could spell...
It could have been spent on the FENCE that Congress voted for but failed to fund.
It could have been spent on sending CONDOMS to Africa so they stop spreading AIDS ;))
2006-12-10 10:19:03 · answer #9 · answered by mariner31 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nothing. We keep throwing money at Africa and it is still a cesspool of disease, starvation and corruption. I'd much rather see my tax dollars go towards fighting for our freedom than for some hair brained UN scam.
2006-12-10 09:14:59 · answer #10 · answered by cornbread 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋