Survival of the Fittest - an Idiotic, Nasty Selfish Ruse?

Question

No, dear. You heard it HERE first.

In my biog of John Lennon, NOT I might add published in America, but published in 1990 in the UK and the Czech Republic, I argue for an end to animal slaughter for food and/or clothing and urge Parliament in the UK, which is where I live, to ban animal slaughter altogether.

True, what the drug companies and other multinationals are doing to Third World countries should not happen to a dog (pardon the expression)

But do not discount the equal tragedies which occur in industrialized, so-called First World nations where inequality is even greater. There are people who must live with tumours until they expire from pain or blockage simply because the medical care in the West, when and where existent, has become lethargic and uncaring. Possibly because we now share universal guilt and suffering. Thus what is caused by the West in the West is marginalised because of what is happening in the Third World.

It is a funny old world!

Answer 1

Umm. . . what was the question again?

Answer 2

I don't think we should go that far, true, some practices regarding animal slaughter in the food industry should be abolished, i.e. raising "veal" pumping cattle full of growth hormones and things of this nature, but we were biologically designed to eat meat. Look at your jaw-structure, you'll find a similar one in bears, apes, and all other omnivorous animals, it isn't healthy to go against your own nature.But, we don't have to alter the genes of livestock thereby causing them to do so either, there is a happy medium.

Answer 3

if you choose to eat fruit so be it enjoy but i eat meat and yes if i was stuck on an island with no food id eat you. id use your kneekap as a lathel if you started talking that shi.te.
the truth is humans eat anything that is how we are at the top of the food chain. you live in your little pad watch tv the last time you saw a tree was when you switched channel. you might be surprised to know that given the right conditions you would eat, not only et , slaughter the animal with your bare hands and eat it cold. enjoy

Answer 4

survibal of the fittest is a fact of nature and develops a stronger species. Having said that, the mindset of taking all you can and shafting the helpless is not a desirable trait among humans.

You reallly need to focus and concentrate on one problem at a time

Answer 5

I think there's worse things than Eugenics enthusiasts with plans of genocide - they're are egotistical shameless self promoters who think people will care they wrote a biog about Lennon.

Didnt want to ask a question at all, did you? ADVERTISE SOME PLACE ELSE.

Answer 6

it appears like we would desire to initiate differentiating between emotional love, and sexual charm. whilst emotional love is needed for extra suitable wellbeing, and wellbeing. actual love, is needed for production of offspring. neither one has any effect on survival of the fittest. . survival of the fittest, is predicated on the reliable preying on the vulnerable. and interior the animal kingdom, the place they try for the the terrific option to reproduce. and in straightforward terms the reliable are allowed to reproduce, for that reason passing on the extra suitable genes. in line with probability it relatively is why that woman canines, have attained this variety of undesirable call.

Answer 7

Darwnian is only a theory and un-Christian. It is not that the unfit people be proressively eliminated through hunger, war, vaccines , diseases bur another fitted group shall eventually emerged on face of the earth.

Answer 8

I was going to answer this by saying 'Survival of the fittest is natures way'. but then i realised i would be marked down.

So I'm not going to give that answer now, I'll say 'save the wales and adopt a pet cow' instead.

Answer 9

Darwin had no intention of the interpretation of that phrase leading to eugenics or "Social Darwinism."

I guess he was not skeptical enough about human nature!

Answer 10

LOL.....that's hilarious.Even if someone actually listened to your Tom foolery,they would never ban animal slaugther...LOL.

Humans eat meat from animals and wear their skins for clothes.

Answer 11

Dear me, here I thought we were having a nice question about Darwin and instead we have a question about ... what exactly was the question? Or are we seeing an almost understandable self-promotion?