the oceans... rivers .. and streams ... and showing it worldwide when big businesses and America. England, Europe and Australia (THE WORST CULPRITS)are doing a better job of it.. ITS SO HYPOCRYTICAL AND LETS OUT EMOTION OF ANGER AND HATRED AT THE HYPOCRYCSY. They even have the cheek to blame the locals...huh!!
2006-12-09 17:33:21 · 3 answers · asked by Saddam 1 in Environment
Well TV is all about ratings. Truth and accuracy is less important than entertainment of "show business" or "viewership". Society has certain images of what the "villian" can be , it's called "political correctness". At one time it meant burning people at the stake for witchcraft --wich if they were so crafty at, how'd they get caught? If you are seeking truth and facts, the television is not the place to look, if you're not content with the brainwashing of the news media, you have to learn to deal with those who would rather be brainwashed.
2006-12-09 17:40:30 · answer #1 · answered by theshadowknows 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wouldn't it's fine if one of the crucial cash used to be donated to charitable companies that might support with the crisis? However, do not worry that the BBC is loosing cash. The gains they take from PBS and Discovery are ample to hide charges. Please observe my sarcasm.
2016-09-03 09:10:33 · answer #2 · answered by rentschler 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
technically since the money belongs to them they can spend it however they want...but i do agree that they should also put bigger businesses and people of bigger cities do this as well as the smaller ones
2006-12-13 08:42:07 · answer #3 · answered by Nikki 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋