No, I would rather call him Bush ....... what a silly question!
2006-12-09 11:32:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by Regina 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
F- yeah! if it's a boy? You bet! Nobody would mess with a kid named Hitler. You could even dress him up in leiderhosen and teach him to goose step and stuff. Give him a wicket Cherman accent yah. Of course my gf is totally against it but...well...technically I guess that means *my* answer is no too but...in my imagination Hell Yes!!!
2006-12-09 11:42:28
·
answer #2
·
answered by Middle Man 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Never. I do not think that naming your child after someone that most of the world hates is a good thing. And he would probably be ridiculed or beaten up or something when he gets older.
2006-12-09 11:41:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No because for one thing it is a surname and two I wouldn't even put that name in my vocabulary because of the history involved around it!
2006-12-09 11:32:03
·
answer #4
·
answered by Trini-HaitianGrl81 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
No, because he was: an anti-Semite, a homophobe, a eugenicist, a racist, and the biggest loser of the 20th century, to mention a few things.
2006-12-09 11:31:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Nowhere Man 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I would name him Ted Hitler after my hero.
2006-12-09 11:31:43
·
answer #6
·
answered by Liza 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Isn't Hitler a surname not a firstname?
and no I wouldn't
I wouldn't name my child Adolf.
2006-12-09 11:29:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Cuddly Lez 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
i would actually name my son adolph hitler because i am part of the hitler family
2006-12-09 11:30:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Never! You'd be pushing your son in one wrong direction.. lol
And plus, he'd be picked on in school..
2006-12-09 11:38:22
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, but I'm rather fond of Lucifer. It would be a good name if it didn't have so much stigma around it.
2006-12-09 11:30:25
·
answer #10
·
answered by Atlas 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, "Hitler" is a surname.
2006-12-09 11:29:59
·
answer #11
·
answered by Elise K 6
·
2⤊
0⤋