Bush continues to peddle juvenile statements about those who engage in terrorist assaults against the United States.............
Bush says, desert Bedouins get off their camels, travel halfway around the world and kill themselves? Bush may convince a fifth grader with that argument, but no person who has outgrown comic books could possibly buy such nonsense.
Bush has reiterated this idiotic statement numerous times.
Red Dawn, provides a perfect example of why Iraqis actually hate us. In one scene, the American guerrillas fighting off murderous invading Cuban and Russian forces capture a Russian special forces soldier and are about to execute him in cold blood. "Jed" holds a revolver up to the Russian's head as his friend protests: "What's the difference between us and them, Jed? What's the difference?"
"Jed" grunts back a reply through clenched teeth: "Because we live here!" .....
Let's get out of Iraq now. They live there. We don't.
2006-12-09 09:30:41 · 15 answers · asked by MrsOcultyThomas 6 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
If a super power invaded us, would we be called terrorist because we were defending our way of life; including our religion? Iragi's , (now it is obvious), want theocracy, why are we pushing democracy down their throats?
2006-12-09 10:03:52 · update #1
I think we did the right thing taking Sadam out of power. (He gassed women and children in the streets, order his own people slaughtered, he was as bad as Hitler, just more careful about it)Now, we should leave well enough alone and bring our guys home.
2006-12-09 09:33:27 · answer #1 · answered by sweetie_baby 6 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Oh Geez. I'm not going to get too deep into this argument so I'll give you the condensed version.
1. Iraq invaded Kuwait and attacked it's neighbors. It possessed WMD's because it used them against Iran and it's own people.
2. A coalition of nations kicked Iraq out of Kuwait and chased their army back into Iraq.
3. Saddam agreed to a ceasefire so that he could stay in office.
4. Over a 10 year period he violated the ceasefire 17 times. On top of that he attacked coalition aircraft. Also he failed to turn over his WMD arsenal. The UN admitted he had WMD's. 9 World Intelligence agencies, including France's and Russia's, admitted he had WMD's.
5. He already violated the ceasefire 17 times. How many more chances were we supposed to give him? He had to be taken out.
6. And just why did the UN oppose Saddam's removal? It's called the UN Oil for Food Scandal. Read up on it. The UN is a very crooked and corrupt organization.
Wisen up people. Can you imagine if during WW2 our Grandparents wanted to back out the war? Look at how many casualties they had in that war. Hitler had to be removed. Just like Saddam.
Oh by the way Hitler never attacked America. So was it justified that we help Europe fight the Nazi's?
And yes we do live here. You think we live behind a forcefield or something?
2006-12-09 09:46:10 · answer #2 · answered by Darktania 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
No.. you are not overlooking anything.. I don't know if any one could have put a set of words that is complete in itself.. conveying a statement typically containing a subject and predicate logic..sooner we get out of Iraq ..the better for the Iraqis..who we treat like the enemy at there home ground ....shame on us
2006-12-09 09:53:49 · answer #3 · answered by JJ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i think you should consider giving speaches for the anti war movement!!
find your local group.
i'm not being sarcastic!!!
you have a good point.
the iraqis were doing pretty well before all their nosy nieghbours came strolling in with guns and unprotected penis'.
the woney that was made in iraq went straint into health care, and eduacation was free for all (including uni), even for women (contrary to belief)
the truth is, would you be happy if so chap came into your 'house' and started bossing you around. - the truth is OF COURSE - NO **** ING WAY!!!
2006-12-09 09:39:46 · answer #4 · answered by Neorini 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, we shouldn't be there at all
Everyone who talks about invading Iraq as a good thing probably don't even know anything about the war that America hasn't put on the news
2006-12-09 09:42:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I have mixed emotions. I never voted for anyone named Bush. I knew he was an idiot.
I was not in favor of the invasion of Iraq. Our president lied to us. However, the Iraqi people are very grateful to have Saddam gone. The radicals are now trying to start a civil war within the country. We went over there and screwed up their country. We cannot just walk away now. We must step up the war and finish it in a hurry.
2006-12-09 09:37:12 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
in case you bear in mind, there replaced into yet another situation occurring in Washington on a similar time. President Clinton replaced into interior the direction of an impeachment technique. So all interest replaced into on that. i've got faith he signed it(Oct,ninety 8), to assuage the "borderline" Republicans on his impeachment vote. yet i do no longer believed there replaced into any investment allotted or it. It replaced into merely a ploy to place Saddam on the mat. And as generic, those dictators do no longer scare, by using fact we can't merely flow in and "do it". We combat a "politically appropriate suited conflict" each and all of the time. the only "cookies" Clinton had have been putting out below his table.
2016-12-30 04:58:23 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are quoting Patrick Swayze and expect us to listen to you? The Iraqi people want their freedom. Do you remember the millions that voted while under the threat of death? We have to stay until Iraq can fend for itself against the Iranians, Syrians and Saudis that are causing so much trouble.
2006-12-09 09:37:23 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Would you prefer we fight them there or here? If we get out of Iraq now, we'll be creating a much larger mess down the line.
2006-12-09 09:52:41 · answer #9 · answered by Bahaus B 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I believe if the civic affairs straight after the surrender had been properly managed the situation would be quite different.
2006-12-09 12:50:41 · answer #10 · answered by Bad bus driving wolf 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We should get the hell out of there and leave Iraq to the Iraqis. Let them sort their own s**t out. Bring our boys home.
2006-12-09 09:38:07 · answer #11 · answered by jare bare 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋