English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why do anybody need proof that God exist? Isnt we, this earth, the sun, moon and stars and the whole galaxcy, all proof of Gods existence? You cannot for one moment think all of this came from nothing. We dont have to proof to anyone the existence of God, He will do it Himself very soon.
Hope you are on the right side......

2006-12-09 06:18:56 · 35 answers · asked by (",)Smokey_-" 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

35 answers

Yip

2006-12-10 17:43:55 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The earth, the sun, the moon, the stars, and the whole galaxy are not proof of God's existence. No more so than they are proof of the Big Bang. Things can actually be traced back to the Big Bang. You can't trace anything to God. People ask me where things came from if there's no God, but that goes both ways. Where did God come from? The question is the same. Neither one of us know the answer. If you're going to play your wild card of, "God doesn't need a creator," then I'm going to say the same about the matter that existed before the Big Bang. Same thing. We might as well not run in circles and just admit that we don't know how the first thing came into existence.

2006-12-09 08:05:03 · answer #2 · answered by robtheman 6 · 0 1

Do you realize how huge a logical fallacy that is? Suppose for the sake of argument that I agree with you that the existence of us, the earth, sun, galaxy etc. somehow proves that their must have been an intelligent supernatural creator. In no way would that imply that the god of the Hebrew Bible is the supernatural creator. Your belief in the demanding, spiteful God of the Bible is not justified simply because the universe exists. You're going to waste your whole life believing in an afterlife that is a myth. You are living a paranoid fantasy that causes you to act irrationally. I hope you wake up from your delusion soon before its too late for you.

2006-12-09 08:15:42 · answer #3 · answered by Jim L 5 · 0 1

Mistake proof

2016-05-22 23:12:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, all of that is not proof that God exists. That is proof that we exist in a world. Take into consideration all the different beliefs. Sure many are similar, but they also have their differences. We argue about which one of those images of God is the real one and we have to wonder why others Don't believe in any of them? It's not hard at all to understand that point of view.

"Hope you are on the right side" doesn't help your "no one has to prove" statement. Just appears you are using threats to at least make them consider your view. I can speak from personal experience on that one.... it doesn't work.

2006-12-09 06:59:44 · answer #5 · answered by Kithy 6 · 1 1

I believe in God, but I could conceive of all around us coming from nothing. I believe God caused the Big Bang, which resulted in the universe; but God does not interfere with it, nor will he be making any kind of appearance. I think the Beatles having a reunion tour is more likely.

2006-12-09 06:30:20 · answer #6 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 1 1

True since I don't believe evolutionists' version of life.

No matter how plausible Darwin’s theory of evolution may appear to be in the eyes of some scientists, they must ultimately face the question, Even if we assume that forms of living things evolved by natural selection, how did life get its start? In other words, the problem lies, not in survival of the fittest, but in arrival of the fittest and the first! However, as Darwin’s remarks on the evolution of the eye indicate, he was not concerned with the problem of how life began. He wrote: “How a nerve comes to be sensitive to light hardly concerns us more than how life itself originated.”

French science writer Philippe Chambon wrote: “Darwin himself wondered how nature selected emerging forms before they were perfectly functional. The list of evolutionary mysteries is endless. And today’s biologists have to humbly admit, with Prof. Jean Génermont of the University of South Paris in Orsay, that ‘the synthetic theory of evolution cannot readily explain the origin of complex organs.’”

In the light of the tremendous odds against such endless variety and complexity of life forms, do you find it difficult to believe that it all evolved in the right direction just by chance? Do you wonder how any creatures could have survived in the battle of the survival of the fittest while they were still evolving eyes? Or while they were supposedly forming primitive fingers on a subhuman body? Do you wonder how cells survived if they existed in an incomplete and inadequate state?

Robert Naeye, a writer for Astronomy magazine and an evolutionist, wrote that life on earth is the result of “a long sequence of improbable events [that] transpired in just the right way to bring forth our existence, as if we had won a million-dollar lottery a million times in a row.” That line of reasoning can probably be applied to every single creature that exists today. The odds are stacked against it. Yet, we are expected to believe that by chance evolution also produced a male and a female at the same time in order for the new species to be perpetuated. To compound the odds, we also have to believe that the male and the female not only evolved at the same time but also in the same place! No meeting, no procreation!

Certainly, it stretches credulity to the limit to believe that life exists in its millions of perfected forms as a result of millions of gambles that paid off.

2006-12-09 06:32:29 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I totally agree! The very existence of everything....the complexity of the way things are made, the beauty of it all, couldnt have happened by chance. Just to look around and actually think about it through and through, how can u say it just came about? Yes! I'm on the right side....glad u are too :) God bless ya

2006-12-09 06:28:28 · answer #8 · answered by Canadian Princess 1 · 1 2

You are so right. Thank you for having faith in God's creations. Life itself is proof of a living God
The Bible states this at Psalm 14:1--"The fool hath said in his heart, "There is no God." They are corrupt; they have done abominable works; there is none that doeth good."

2006-12-09 06:28:39 · answer #9 · answered by Micah 6 · 0 1

I'd say it's mostly because if you actually pay attention, as many have, you can find other solutions to most every part of existence as we know it other than god. The initial creation is about the only thing we really can't pin down, but it's not like we've been able to watch what happened now is it?

2006-12-09 06:25:21 · answer #10 · answered by distind 2 · 1 2

You're right, I don't believe it came from nothing. It existed eternally. No need for a deity, not even yours. In fact, the quantum physics supports this hypothesis. It's known as the inflaton theory, and it describes the formation of the primary universal constants very consistently.

There is no god. Existence is not proof, nor is the Bible.

2006-12-09 06:22:16 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 3

fedest.com, questions and answers