yes your right, remember the massacre in haditha by u.s troops, a war crime, where u.s troops raped a small child and massacred 24 innicent civillians and later blamed thier deaths on a fire fight, how sad and cowardly is that, this incident you describe goes on in iraq everyday.thats why out of the 700,000 civillians killed since the invasion over 30% have been caused by the u.s forces. the soviets fought house to house hand to hand in the senod world war hence they lost so many soldeirs, the u.s don't have courage it seems.ohh well all these war crimes all recorded for the war crimes tribunal.
2006-12-09 02:46:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
9⤋
If you're willing to take the time to make sure what you feed him is nutritionally sound, that's fine. But many of today's commercial foods provide nutrients dogs might not get in table scraps. I'm doing well on sort of a combo. He gets 3 meals a day (usually) and all of them contain at least some of his dry food. But if he finishes off someone's plate, then he just gets extra dry the next meal. Also, be sure to avoid toxins. Onions are especially bad for many dogs, and onion powder is even worse. There's not all that many foods that are truly toxic, but do familiarize yourself with them. Raisins and chocolate are two of the top ones, as well. Same with macademia nuts.
2016-05-22 22:49:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah WMD your credibility is looking pretty sad, kinda like your half baked accusation.
Jessica- OOOORAHHH
Do you think that the U.S. is the only military in the world that uses close air support?
I see a huge flaw in your thinking. First of all you are working for Amnesty International- I wouldn't tell people that if I really wanted to be heard.
Secondly, quite simply, you believe what you read and see in the media and lack the brain power to think something out.
If you were living in a country where "insurgents", "terorrists" etc.. were freely running rampant, killing innocent people just to feed their need for atention and to draw negative media coverage. In the process they are getting your friends, family and children killed. Would you sit there and cry or would you kick the bastards out yourself?
I am guesssing you have no clue what it is like to be in a combat situation, so you can excuse yourself from any comments, judgements or opinions.
The U.S. has paved the way for the Iraq people to take the reigns of thier own government, they just don't seem too willing to make the move.
Cowardly?
IED's, booby traps, and mines are cowardly
Hiding behind non-combatants is cowardly
Recording the slitting of throats, and "sending them in" from a hiding place is cowardly
Running across the borders of any country who will "turn their heads" is cowardly
Thinking about it, "AMNESTY" is cowardly. You are about as hippocritical as they come, you want to "forgive" some while judging and condemning others.
Go *** yourself!
2006-12-09 03:44:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by konstipashen 5
·
4⤊
2⤋
You've obviously never served in the military, and I'd go so far as to add tht you've probably never served anything but your own narrow and pathetic interests for your entire life.
Who are YOU to talk of cowardice, you and all the other spectators out there, who've never answered your country's call because you've bought into the propaganda of the loony left?
As far as Iraq and Afghanistan are concerned, if you've never been there, you have absolutely NOTHING worthwhile to say on the subject, and have no right to judge those of us who have.
Amnesty International, huh? Is this the same Amnesty International that was funded and supported through cut-outs by the old Soviet Union as a tool to undermine public opinion of Western governments? Yeah, I thought so.
2006-12-09 03:36:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by grenadier8408 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
Let's see...russian news? come on now! Not exactly the friendliest country towards the US. think about this: Insurgants don't play fair. The rules of war don't apply to these people. They have no respect and commit war crimes on a daily basis. I know someone who came back from Iraq jumpy because these people would strap explosives to children who were normally friendly to the soldiers and send them running up to the soldiers. You call that brave? That's cowardice in it's worst and deadliest form. Don't you dare say you know when you don't. You've never seen combat. You don't know everything that happens there. You only know what the media tells you. Remember no matter how objective the media says it is, it is still biased. It will always be biased and there's not much that can be done to change that.
2006-12-09 03:36:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mommy 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
They aren't cheering (you stupid idiot) when they kill civilians.
Why don't you sit there and watch al queda network news and cheer on the insurgents and terrorists who CHEER ANYTIME A LIFE IS LOST NO MATTER IF IT'S AFGHAN CIVILIAN OR AMERICAN OR ALLIE.
They don't give a rat's a.ss who they kill. They then place the blame on US troops.
I'm not saying that air strike DON'T kill civilians - but when it's 25 ally troops facing 200 taliban - that is thier only choice.
I wish you had the freaking guts to walk up to someone who served in Afghanistan and call them a coward. You don't have the balls to do it.
2006-12-09 04:40:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
so whyle you were talking about cowardly attacks, i notice you failed to mention IED's , Car bombs, cell phone bombs, and everything else of that sort.... Kinda one sided don't you think?
Then of course the capture and sawing off heads of prisoners , that takes a lot of balls to chop up a defenceless person, there glad they are so much braver than us. The problem isI MO that the Civies in Iraq KNOW the terrorist, insurgant whatever ou want ot call the scum, Is in their building, on their street , in their neighborhood, they KNOW the scum will attempt to cause damage and hopefuly civie deaths to further his own personal cause. But they still do nothing they even protect the scum, they pretty much ALL have their own guns, if they would stop being so cowardly and protect their own neighborhoods from insurgants who take over a house next to them and shoot them or rat them out themselves, they wouldn't get the house next to them blown to bits.
I take it you see this as a police action? We should knock on the door and say we have a warrant to pick up so and so on suspected terrorism charges? Give them tickets to pay fines on? Maybe we should just offer a hugs and a $100 dollar bill?
2006-12-09 02:57:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by lethander_99 4
·
2⤊
2⤋
First, your a jackass. Second, do you remember 9/11, thousands of these worthless muslims dancing in the streets and partying as the towers fell? Do you remember seeing thousands of cheering people enjoy themselves as dead soldiers were dragged through the streets. We don't try to kill civilians, but it happens, and thats sad, but we dont bind and execute hundreds of iraqis and hide their bodies because they are sunni, or shiite. Cowards you say? I have been to iraq and afghanistan, never once have they attacked other than by an IED or a misplaced mortar round. They hide behind civilians and kill each other over a religion.
2006-12-09 04:20:24
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
You sound like a bleeding heart that has never experienced much because you been hiding behind your mothers skirt.
Those guys do whatever they think best at the time and they don't need you sitting comfortably at home trying to second guess them.
You should try enlisting yourself, you might learn something.
2006-12-09 03:52:00
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I'm tired of these do-gooder "judges" that have not been there.
Do you know what it's like having a young child playing with a doll walk up to you and pull a pin that's inserted inside the head of that doll?
They are ALL brainwashed from birth that Americans are evil and must be destroyed at all costs. Every civilian is a risk. Women, children, young, old, it doens't matter.
Cowardly act? What would you do to stop someone from shooting at you? Out there it's you or them.
They are NOT cheering for the civilians that die. They are releasing the adrenalin from battle. It's a huge rush. I'm not saying "rush" like it's a good thing. It's just a HUGE relief that they don't have someone shooting at them anymore.
2006-12-09 02:47:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
4⤋
LMFAO you didn't even read your whole article. HAHAHA You missed this part or left it out of purpose.
War is war the fact is American troops have not killed enough and have been to lax on their campaign. The Arabs have learned put your civilians in harms way then scream about it when they get killed and the west will roll over and play nice.
Plus who believe was the russian press puts out. I mean how would the reply to this information.
Alpha.male 29 best answers, all but 1 from the other names on this list.
Alpha.female 25 best answers all but 1from the other names on this list.
The_reporter 25 best answers, all but 4 from the other names on this list.
News.caster 31 best answers, all from the other names on this list.
Mr.truth 31 best answers, all but 2 from the other names on this list.
Mrs.truth 29 best answers, all from the other names on this list.
W.M.D’s_brother 18 best answers, all but 1 from this list.
Out of a total of 188 best answers all but 9 are from these 7 IDs.
They award 96.25 of the questions they ask best answers to themselves.
2006-12-09 03:11:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by jessica a 2
·
4⤊
2⤋