DNA disapproves of the evolution theory. Evolutionists don't like to be told they are wrong but make yourself happy and explain it to God on judgement day.
2006-12-08 19:51:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Paul S 2
·
0⤊
6⤋
It is not clear the intent of this question, therefore i Will ask this
What is evolution.
The tendency for the strongest specimen, (or best adapting) to survive to reproduce.
Please clarify what you mean.
All animals evolve, and how rapidly depends on the existence of genetic mutation, which is necessary for evolution. It is happening with all animals, and dogs are, as any animal is, a great proof of evolution.
2006-12-08 19:58:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by Master John 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Me, I am too tired to explain that a Dog as a species is a variety of breeds meaning variations of alleles, different base pairs. Another species has a seperate number of chromosomes and a different amount of DNA. Natural selection as outline by Darwin would remove the bad genes, since those organisms who had them would have less of a chance to survive. But natural selection no matter over how long could possibly add to the DNA of an organism as to vary it into a new constituent species which is incapable of reproducing with its parent species.
God-Willing I will prove this in science, and finally the great fraud of evolution will be proved just like phrenology. Hey it made sense, until you knew more!
2006-12-08 19:54:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
no longer likely evolution. each and all the achievable characteristics that exist in canines now have been already interior the genetic code of wolves first of all. precisely controlled breeding to administration the visual allure of particular characteristics over others has given us each and all the breeds we've. If a society intentionally killed every physique who did no longer have blonde hair, interior some generations there could be a heavily larger proportion of blonde little ones being born there....besides the shown fact that it does not be evolution with the help of Darwin's time-honored. it would in basic terms be people tampering with the interior sight gene pool. Left to itself, the inhabitants might ultimately revert back to the time-honored variety of hair colours.
2016-10-14 08:02:09
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Dogs are the closest spiritual relative of humans. That means that as many human Souls complete their journey, new place is taken by dogs' Souls becoming human. You recognise them by being better people.
Apes are human caricatures. Increasingly, Souls that transgressed against the basic values of humanity incarnate into them, as a punishment.
Read "Rational Spirituality" on the Dhaxem website, to learn about real Evolution.
Conveyed only in February 2006, it is already the thinking person's modern bible.
This reply was given to you by someone who dedicated herself to spirituality and to the advancement of dogs, as spiritual beings.
2006-12-08 19:58:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
G'day Lilith,
Thank you for your question.
You are quite right. Darwin got his idea for natural selection from the way that animal and plant breeders bred species for specific traits. His theory was that natural selection worked in a similar way in that animals and plants that were better adopted to their environment were more likely to pass on these traits to their offspring.
I have attached resources for your reference.
Seasons regards
2006-12-08 20:00:13
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
I use this example all the time.
It is clear proof of evolution, human controlled albeit, but proof none the less.
Paul: enlighten us then, what about DNA proves evolution couldn't have occured?
2006-12-08 19:52:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Depends what you mean by evolution. Yeah, there's lots of varieties of dogs. But all dogs are dogs. Not one of them can breed with a cat or a fish. The answer is no, dogs are not proof of evolution.
2006-12-08 19:53:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
A very good example is the breeding of dogs.
Another is the mutations of viruses to become resistant to medications.
2006-12-08 19:51:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sara 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Good point, there is plenty of evidence to say that things can change over time and have you're right.
BUT
Where did everything start...thats where people think creation comes in.
2006-12-08 19:49:59
·
answer #10
·
answered by luko b 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is the best demonstration of artificial selection in the animal kingdom.
2006-12-09 01:32:33
·
answer #11
·
answered by novangelis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋