No. This is a very old Myth with absolutely no evidence.
I Cr 13;8a
12-9-6
2006-12-08 19:38:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 7
·
3⤊
2⤋
Mary the Virgin gave birth to Jesus!
Mary the Magdalene ("woman from Magdala") didn't give birth to him or any other children, as far as real records indicate.
"The Holy Blood and the Holy Grail", copied by "The DaVinci Code", try to suggest she did - but with absolutely no factual support!
2006-12-09 03:49:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Before you count your chickens, should you not find out first if Mary Magdalene had anything to do with Jesus? Or are you asking if she had immaculate conceptions?
2006-12-09 03:41:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by willgvaa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Saint Mary Magdalene was the first witness to the resurrection of Jesus. (See the 20th Chapter of the Gospel of John).
She was one of Jesus' followers during his ministry, and was present at the cross when he died.
There is some debate on whether she is the woman in Luke 7 who was a notorious sinner. Most biblical scholars believe that Mary Magdalene was not the notorious sinner.
The 8th chapter of the Gospel of Luke describes Mary Magdalene as being healed and supporting Jesus' ministry out of her means.
There is no scholarly (or any other) evidence that she married Jesus and bore his children
With love in Christ.
2006-12-09 12:03:27
·
answer #4
·
answered by imacatholic2 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on whether you believe Jesus was divine or not. If not, well he would have been married, all Jews had to be in the time he lived, you also had to be married to be called Rabbi, and the obvious choice of his wife would be Mary Magdelane, and she would have had his children, owing to lack of birth control...If he is divine, he wasn't married, despite being brought up as Jewish, so Mary would not have had his children.
There's not a lot of evidence either way.
2006-12-09 14:41:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by pixiefeet@btinternet.com 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. Contrary to the DaVinci Code - old stuff, not even explained very well. There are dozens of books from the time of the Bible. Ain't so.
2006-12-09 03:44:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by Joe Cool 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Let me get back to you I'm watching the DaVinci Code. I'll tell after it's over.
2006-12-09 04:55:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No it is highly doubtful,unless you feed into the whole lame Davinci code movie and books.
2006-12-09 03:44:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Chosen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh no, I'll bet you've read the Dcode. More propaganda to confuse the innocent that don't know any better. Turn to your Bible, it won't lead you astray.
2006-12-09 06:04:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by skeptical_illusions 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. You must have just watched the DaVinci Code. That's just a movie and has no merit at all if you read the Bible.
2006-12-09 03:40:23
·
answer #10
·
answered by belleebuttons 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
According to the Bible she did not have "sexual intercourse" but did give birth in the manger!
BEST ANSWER!
2006-12-09 03:40:50
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋