in hebrew letters are numbers too so the whole book is code because some numbers mean words as well
2006-12-08 16:54:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by tommy beresford 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
That it has as much reliability as looking up the future in a copy of Moby Dick. The latter has been done and been as equally accurate. The whole thing is a hoax.
2006-12-08 16:53:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by The Doctor 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yeah, I find it interesting that nothing like this really exists. It's all speculation and made up stuff. You can 'find codes' in any book on this planet if you have a lot of time and a lot of imagination. The Bible is God's word and it's clear as day.
2006-12-08 16:53:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
aside from it not being real and if i use "the bible code" on a harry potter book it will produce similar results and this has been proven that it has no relevance once o ever because it works on all books its totally a hoax ask a scientist
2006-12-08 17:00:46
·
answer #4
·
answered by #1 joker 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I doubt its true, theres a bunch of software online to try to find codes, Theres a movie and book(novel) called omega code on it.
2006-12-08 16:57:52
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There is NOTHING interesting about Bible code. A roomfull of monkeys with typewriters is more interesting than stupid Bible code.
2006-12-08 16:56:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by skepsis 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Have you seen "A Beautiful Mind"? It's a movie about a guy who enjoyed decoding things that were never encoded.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Beautiful_Mind_%28film%29
2006-12-08 18:25:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by todaywiserthanyesterday 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The little nicky knacky dots in the original script (Dead Sea Scrolls) are (guess what?) musical notes.
2006-12-08 16:54:08
·
answer #8
·
answered by Shinigami 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Bible code? it's just as rediculous as the bible it's self.
2006-12-08 16:53:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
Read the books...they are awesome! I'm a Christian and I feel they are true.
2006-12-08 16:53:09
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋