English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From my limited knowledge of evolutionthe first single celled organism and everything was created by a big bang. Wouldn't that just be a rip off of creationism?

2006-12-08 16:28:10 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

19 answers

I think everyone here needs to study up.

The Big Bang was responsible for taking free hydrogen, free electrons, free positrons and other "light" matter and evolutionizing it into bonded complexes that gave us helium, oxygen, nitrogen, argon right up to uranium. It also provided the growth base and raw inorganic chemicals that didn't exist in abudnace prior to the Big Bang which eventually manifested into ribo-nuclaic acids which is what gave birth to microbes, viruses, amoeba, bactrium.

Without the Big Bang we'd be a bunch of floting rock mass and free hydrogen gas.

That's what we'll be at the end of time. A bunch of burnt out star cores, a bunch of cold, rocky planets and a lot of free gases caused by nova. They'll be some sporatic frozen methane from Jupiter and Saturn but this eventually falls into the black holes of space or clusters to become a larger and large mass until gravity makes another singularity and another bang might possibly happen.

In the begining there will be a void A dark universe of nothing but burnt out rock and if a singularity manifests there will be light in one brilliant moment and the universe will form and cool and planets will manifest and turn and there will day and night and as it cools there will be seas and eventually they will separate from the land and life will come forth.

That's creationism.

The thing of it is, is it done by someone willful intent or is it just a roll of the dice. Are we a cosmic accident or were we made with willful intent. Are we orphans or do we have a parent.

2006-12-08 16:40:17 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The Big Bang has nothing to do with evolution. The Big Bang is about the origin of the universe. Evolution has to do with the development of life from earlier species to later ones. I cannot see how it's a rip off of creationism.

2006-12-08 16:30:49 · answer #2 · answered by The Doctor 7 · 2 0

Professor Adjineri is incorrect lower back. (he's amazingly a guy!) you do no longer could desire to have a scientific clarification for some thing in the previous you ought to use it. If it works, you ought to use it. The birds did no longer have a theory of flight, yet they flew. women did no longer understand what made cleansing soap do what it does (many nevertheless do no longer), yet they have been given their clothing clean besides. that's the version between a discovery and an invention. Darwin discovered what the animals and plant life were doing with the aid of time. He did no longer invent the phenomenon, he only defined it in a fashion that made extra experience than people who wrote in the previous, mutually with Lamarck.

2016-12-30 04:21:27 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Do you even know what evolution is? And no, the big bang did not create anything, it just released energy that was already present. Man created creationism.

2006-12-08 16:32:01 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No it is not.The big bang talks of how the universe and matter came to be. Evolution explains how all the organisms and diversity in life came to be the way they are now. Science and religion are two seperate things. Religion is based on belief while scince is based on observations.

2006-12-08 16:40:35 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Your knowledge is limited. The big bang started the universe, not life.

2006-12-08 16:29:58 · answer #6 · answered by STFU Dude 6 · 4 0

I guess if you try really hard not to understand Evolution or the Big Bang than your answer is yes (or whatever you want it to be).


To be fair, you did at least admit your knowledge is limited.

2006-12-08 16:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by skeptic 6 · 0 0

I'm not sure what you mean by "rip-off," but some people want to understand the universe around them by what we see around us - keep in mind that this mode of thinking is what is responsible for you living your luxurious lifestyle, comfy and warm in front of your computer.

2006-12-08 16:34:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't see the connection. Big bang, 14 billion years ago, and life on earth 3.5 billion years ago. Creationism, god created earth and life in six days six thousand years ago.

2006-12-08 16:33:51 · answer #9 · answered by T-Roc 2 · 0 1

Not really.

Evolutionary theory, abiogenesis, and the beginnings of the universe are really different fields of study. You might try reading up on them before deciding to dismiss anything.

2006-12-08 16:31:56 · answer #10 · answered by N 6 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers