2006-12-08 13:32:01 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
Not sure why this in R&S, but the answer is 119
There is no "year 0"...so go right from 1 BC to 1 AD, although that is archaic terminology. These days we say BCE or CE (before common era, common era)
2006-12-08 13:34:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He could be either 120 or 119 depending on the month he was born and the month he died. And there wasn't a year 0.
2006-12-08 13:34:06 · answer #2 · answered by Jerse 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends, was he born in March and died in May? or vice versa?
And there was NO year zero, sorry. That's why the millenium started in 2001, not 2000.
2006-12-08 13:33:45 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
120
2006-12-08 13:38:07 · answer #4 · answered by herenthere 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
153 y/o
2006-12-08 13:36:17 · answer #5 · answered by mandbturner3699 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
121, since we count the zero.
Doh! No zero? My bad.
2006-12-08 13:33:38 · answer #6 · answered by Atlas 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
119, there was no zero year
2006-12-08 13:35:30 · answer #7 · answered by abram.kelly 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
87 y/o
Cheers
2006-12-08 13:34:29 · answer #8 · answered by iamwhoiam 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
too old for this to be possible
2006-12-08 13:34:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
3600 years old - very easy to compute 60 times 60 = 3600 years old........
2006-12-08 13:34:19 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 6⤋