THE ARTICLE IS WORTH READING OR I WOULDN'T POST IT:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/magazine/03arabs.html?pagewanted=3&_r=2
2006-12-08 13:12:21 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/03/magazine/03arabs.html?pagewanted=1&_r=2
2006-12-08 13:12:50 · update #1
The closed-minded fool who answered first is a perfect example of the American 'Christian', and a perfect example of why people should have to score at least 85 (lol) on an I.Q. test to be allowed to vote. I think if they could, they'd be stoning gays. Ignorant morons.
2006-12-08 13:29:34 · answer #1 · answered by GODZILLA 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I speak for many Christians when I say we would be happy if abortion were abolished. As far as being gay; if people want to do it, then let them. They will choose their own path to destruction. But we will continue to speak out and give a warning to that which God condemns!
2006-12-08 13:28:38 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Absolutely. They want to get even for everyone learning that the Catholic Church has admitted that 30/40% of it's priests are Gay. I'm sure that there are Gay men of the cloth throughout all the religions.
2006-12-08 13:20:20 · answer #3 · answered by The professor 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I didn't see Christian mentioned, just a lot of Egypt.
Where did you reach the assumption of American Christians?
It wasn't worth reading.
2006-12-08 13:17:51 · answer #4 · answered by beedaduck 3 · 2⤊ 3⤋
why in the world did you choose that name, the idoit who was born with that name is more stupid that any retard.
2006-12-08 13:22:58 · answer #5 · answered by Okami Ryuu 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Sorry, I never read ANYthing from the good-for-bird-cage-waste garbage that spews from the nyt
2006-12-08 13:15:20 · answer #6 · answered by Jeff C 4 · 1⤊ 5⤋