Both believers and non-believers seem to need to put subtle digs at the other side.
Non-believers in WHAT ?
Is there an inherent difference between 'believers' and 'non-believers' ?
2006-12-08 10:44:05 · 5 answers · asked by ??IMAGINE ?? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
There are two positions that are mutually exclusive here.
People who 'believe' in things without any evidence to justify their belief and those who are not willing to turn off their thinking brain and self hypnotize to become believers in something they see as empirically impossible.
People who believe they are 'saved' because they buy into myths
as being ultra true and those who seek to get them to see the other side has merit too are not likely to find any middle ground on which they can agree any time soon.
2006-12-09 13:21:37 · answer #1 · answered by surfnsfree 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I can partially understand why believers would defend their religion.
What I don't understand is why the non believers try and prove them wrong. They have nothing to gain, so why try? All they do is upset people.
What I really don't get is why argue about it at all? There is only one truth. At the end of the line, everyone will know. Here on Earth, now in time, what happens when we die doesn't matter. It only matters when it happens.
2006-12-08 10:56:18 · answer #2 · answered by jeff_is_sexy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Just the belief part. We are all human and we all sin...no matter what other believers may think. Therefore none of us should be pointing fingers at the other.
2006-12-08 10:47:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Non-believers in god and or religion
2006-12-08 10:46:46 · answer #4 · answered by Dr. Brooke 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
non-believers in God......its easier to say that than this question is for agnostics, atheists, and so on
2006-12-08 10:46:35 · answer #5 · answered by Nikki 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋