If Creation-based belief is "creationism", why isn't Evolution based belief called "evolutionism"?

Answer 1

It is.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolutionism
http://www.anthrobase.com/Dic/eng/def/evolutionism.htm
http://www.as.ua.edu/ant/Faculty/murphy/evol.htm
http://www.answers.com/topic/evolutionism
http://etext.virginia.edu/cgi-local/DHI/dhi.cgi?id=dv2-21

Answer 2

If it were a belief system it would be "Evolutionism". As it is a critically reveiwed scientific discipline, it is the "theory of evolution" or "evolution" for short.

And why do "Scientific" Creationists call their opponents "evolutionists"? They can't win on logic, so they turn to rhetoric. They create an opponent that is supposedly dedicated to the dogma of science, and they sound stupid when they call their opponents "scientists".

Answer 3

The question of whether the seven days of introduction have been literal days, or symbolic of ranges of progression is surely beside the point to the elementary actuality that introduction happened. The observable universe, the earth under our ft, and one and all human beings exist. Who desires greater information than that? guy became into created while he became into created, yet he became into created by using God, yet what bearing directly to the dinosaurs? Genesis one million:21 And God created super whales, and each residing creature that moveth, which the waters delivered forth abundantly, after their variety, and each winged rooster after his variety: and God observed that it became into good, the Blue whale is larger than any dinosaur that ever roamed the earth and we have confidence crocodiles to be dinosaurs and in accordance to evolution birds resemble dinosaurs so what’s the subject? And to the scientists and wanna be scientists, you could comprehend that God is the author because of the fact he's such as you, how oftentimes do you think approximately what became into in contact in that introduction? properly God too is a chemist, a physicist, an astronomer, and a biologist. he's likewise maximum actual an artist, a maker of all our international's attractiveness. he's the lawmaker of all the unseen forces that make "nature" orderly and predictable. The universe because it exists became into not produced by using a few cosmic twist of destiny. The situations of introduction have been intricately planned and considered. A mindless out of control "massive bang" might bring about destruction and chaos, not the existence and order we now see. Order does not prepare to what we do, God basically created what he did interior the beginning up, existence and the thank you to help existence, something after that we've created so which you will not carry him responsible for something we do to ourselves. I won't pray which you hit upon peace and happiness interior the elementary issues yet i'm going to choose which you do. To the adult males accessible, guy up and be a relatives guy, to the ladies accessible, have some admire for yourselves.

Answer 4

Evolution based thought is called common sense.

Answer 5

I think you've come down with a case of questionism and miscomparisonism at the same time. People who answer every question with "God did it!" are called creationists. Let's suppose you asked an evolutionary scientist: "What is time?" or "What is a quark?" or "What is a star?" If he says "Evolution did it!" then he's either drunk and/or pulling your leg because he thinks you're a creationist.

Answer 6

Because it's not a belief; it's a science. The science of evolutionary biology. You are insulting science by referring to it as a belief, by saying that we need faith when we have millions and millions of pieces of evidence.

www.talkorigins.org

Answer 7

and why isn't a belief in gravity called "gravitism" or a belief that the earth is round called "roundism"

Answer 8

It's not about a belief... evolution is about scientifical facts.

Answer 9

Evolutionism is a word that means just that!
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/evolutionism

Answer 10

Would you call belief in gravity gravitionism?

Answer 11

Perhaps it should be called evolved thinking.