It went online today?? www.whoisyourcreator.com
I have looked it over. It looks pretty good. They have a list of scientist who go on record as not believing in Darwinism.
2006-12-08 07:50:30 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I wish, I could. Darwinism has been scientifically discarded long back.
2006-12-11 17:34:52 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'll take a look.
It goes straight into a rant about how evolution is totally bunk. It's not objective or comparative. It launches directly into a tirade about the implausibility of evolution and the supposedly egregious lack of certainty amidst scientists regarding the origins of existence.
First of all, I suppose none of these people have ever heard of Richard Dawkins... go do a search for "The Blind Watchmaker" on http://youtube.com and watch each part... and then listen to anything Dawkins has to say. He's brilliant and you won't be disappointed.
Secondly, I don't think that site is taking into consideration the recent proof for the Big Bang. Perhaps they should pay more attention to the people who win Nobel Prizes.
2006-12-08 15:54:05 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
I saw quite a few quotes taken out of context. Mary Leakey's statement about the branching tree does not mean she didn't believe in evolution - it meant she believed in a straight line evolution.
Yea just another Dr. Dino. a site with an agenda.
2006-12-08 16:02:13 · answer #3 · answered by Sage Bluestorm 6 · 5⤊ 0⤋
What an amazing list! And so long!! Wow!!
Oh wait, let's compare lists, just for fun. You are aware of the "Steve List", right? It's a list of scientists that support evolution, and that list is much longer that the whole list on that cute little website you just spammed here.
Only difference is: the Steve List only listed the scientists who are named Steve. So, even if you would take only the scienists who are named Steve, that little list would still outnumber your entire list of "scientists". Funny, huh?
Geezz...
2006-12-08 15:58:19 · answer #4 · answered by Thinx 5 · 7⤊ 0⤋
Server not found error.
Just a hint, always wait 24 - 48 hours before annoucing a site. Its DNS records may not have properly propagated throughout the DNS hierarchy.
2006-12-08 15:55:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never mind about the creationist obsession with Darwinism-what do they say about the fact of biological evolution and who cares if they're scientists- only if they're biologists are their views relevant and of any value.
2006-12-08 15:56:45 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
I have seen it. It is very innovative and interesting. But ZERO COOL like persons have commented without looking at the website. All her comments are likewise based on ignorance. She rates herself too high even as compared to Scientists.
2006-12-12 08:14:53 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's a bogus site. They're asking for an explanation for 'the mechanism that drives evolution'. No one is claiming to understand the mechanism that drives evolution. This is why it remains a theory.
To put this in perspective, no one can explain the mechanism that drives gravity either. This is why it remains a theory.
2006-12-08 15:59:06 · answer #8 · answered by Michael 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
It is excellent. But what is sad is persons with out seeing have started commenting like Zero Cool. She is a psychiatric case, but she is in the habit of suggesting people to go to psychiatrists.
2006-12-12 08:20:49 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It starts with Phillip Skell. If that is the best they can do (and it is, because he is actually a member of NAS) it is pretty sad.
2006-12-08 15:55:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Wow, another drdino.com...Will they be using the same baseless illogical arguments?
...looked, and not a whole lot of new stuff there, just the same ol fundie nonsense
2006-12-08 15:56:31 · answer #11 · answered by bc_munkee 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋